[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14600583#comment-14600583
]
Ferdinand Xu edited comment on PARQUET-319 at 6/26/15 7:02 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14602532#comment-14602532
]
Ryan Blue commented on PARQUET-41:
--
Thanks for working on this, [~Ferd], it's great to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14603401#comment-14603401
]
Ryan Blue commented on PARQUET-41:
--
I just posted a google spreadsheet to back up the num
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-41?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14602532#comment-14602532
]
Ryan Blue edited comment on PARQUET-41 at 6/26/15 7:53 PM:
---
Than
Hi,
I see ParquetRecordWriterWrapper constructor is getting/initializing
a TaskAttemptID object that will be passed to the
getRecordWriter(TaskAttemptContext taskAttemptContext, Path file) method of
ParquetOutputFormat. But this method only gets the Configuration and
CompressionCodeName objects to
I thought the wrapper was translating from the mapred API used by Hive
to the mapreduce API that Parquet implements. If there is a better way
to do this that is less expensive, I think that would be a good change.
rb
On 06/26/2015 04:01 PM, Sergio Pena wrote:
Hi,
I see ParquetRecordWriterWra
