Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet 1.12.0 RC1

My (non-binding) is that this is ok. In a different Apache project, we didn't allow a change like that in minor versions and it delayed some key work by several months. On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:00 AM Gabor Szadovszky wrote: > Thanks a lot, Fokko. > > Regarding the breaking change. We have the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet 1.12.0 RC1

Thanks a lot, Fokko. Regarding the breaking change. We have the maven plugin japicmp executed in the verify phase so I was curious why it did not catch this issue. It seems the plugin allows source incompatible changes for minor version upgrades by default. It sounds reasonable to me but I am

[GitHub] [parquet-mr] gszadovszky closed pull request #534: Adding change in the parquet record-reader so that it reads the first value lazily

gszadovszky closed pull request #534: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/534 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[GitHub] [parquet-mr] gszadovszky commented on pull request #534: Adding change in the parquet record-reader so that it reads the first value lazily

gszadovszky commented on pull request #534: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-mr/pull/534#issuecomment-768890613 Thanks, @tlazaro. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,