pitrou commented on pull request #168:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/168#issuecomment-797009554
I've opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-1998 for the C++
implementation. @ggershinsky Can I let you do the same for the Java
implementation?
pitrou commented on pull request #168:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/168#issuecomment-796877818
It does have a couple [other
things](https://github.com/lz4/lz4/blob/dev/doc/lz4_Frame_format.md), including
a magic number and an optional checksum (computed using
pitrou commented on pull request #168:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/168#issuecomment-796687561
Ok, distilling here the feedback from Yann Collet (the author of LZ4): the
frame format is beneficial as it provides a standard encoding for the
compressed and uncompressed
pitrou commented on pull request #168:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/168#issuecomment-795853899
Thanks for the reference. I'll wait a bit in case I get some feedback from
the LZ4 mailing-list.
In any case, what is the procedure for merging an update in the
pitrou commented on pull request #168:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/168#issuecomment-795390108
I've also sent [a message](https://groups.google.com/g/lz4c/c/d6V12JKr5Fw)
to the LZ4 mailing-list to gather their feedback on this proposal.
pitrou commented on pull request #168:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/168#issuecomment-795136194
> What do you think about adding links to the codec specifications directly
instead of to the C/C++ implementations?
I was not aware that those even existed. I'll add
