[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 2.0.25 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of Apache PDFBox version 2.0.25. The release is available for download at: https://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html See the full release notes below for details about this release. Release Notes -- Apache PDFBox -- Version 2.0.25 In

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.25

Am 13.12.21 um 20:02 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 2.0.25. +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Timo Boehme +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out. An

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.25

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.25 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.25/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/2.0.25/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is e143b2a9aaa4b1f1be

Re: Code Scanning / Security Analysis on github repo

Am 10.12.21 um 10:25 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Shall we enable it (wo need to look if I have the rights to do so)? Do we need to cast a vote for that? ... Just do it. We can stop it if it doesn't work or anything else comes up. Andreas BR Maruan Am Mittwoch, dem 08.12.2021 um 12:12 +0

Re: Build issue

Done, see PDFBOX-5338 Am 09.12.21 um 08:04 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, I've accidentally commited some changes without a comment and atr least one class is missing. I'm going to fix that soon Andreas - To u

Build issue

Hi, I've accidentally commited some changes without a comment and atr least one class is missing. I'm going to fix that soon Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

2.0.25 Release?

Hi, how about cutting a 2.0.25 release next week (Monday or Tuesday)? It would be nice to have another one this year. Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h..

Re: [DISCUSS] Move trunk (3.0) to Java 11

Am 23.11.21 um 08:35 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Hi, what about setting Java 11 as a minimum requirement for trunk, upcoming 3.0 release? Not that we have to use classes/constructs... from Java 11 but as Java 8 is outdated declaring Java 11 as a minimum requirement will have the benefit that

Re: Fwd: [NOTICE] - Moving and Upgrading of Buildbot Jobs

The job was deleted Andreas Am 23.11.21 um 08:06 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22560 Am 25.09.21 um 11:03 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, I've stumbled upon the attached mail and learned that a buildbot job for PDFBox exists [1]. I'

Re: Fwd: [NOTICE] - Moving and Upgrading of Buildbot Jobs

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22560 Am 25.09.21 um 11:03 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, I've stumbled upon the attached mail and learned that a buildbot job for PDFBox exists [1]. I've no idea who created that job. It looks like it is limited to run the rat lic

Re: [DISCUSS] Performance tests for PDFBox

Am 18.10.21 um 08:36 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Am Montag, dem 18.10.2021 um 07:26 +0200 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Am 17.10.21 um 20:39 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Am Sonntag, dem 17.10.2021 um 12:45 +0200 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 Yes this should be done, although I don&#

Re: [DISCUSS] Performance tests for PDFBox

Am 17.10.21 um 20:39 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Am Sonntag, dem 17.10.2021 um 12:45 +0200 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 Yes this should be done, although I don't really know how. Maybe it's just windows, or maybe it's just me, but I found it difficult to get reliable, reproducable benchmarks

[REPORT] PDFBox - October 2021

## Description: The mission of PDFBox is the creation and maintenance of software related to Java library for working with PDF documents ## Issues: There are no issues requiring board attention at this time. ## Membership Data: Apache PDFBox was founded 2009-10-21 (12 years ago) There are curr

Apache PDFBox Board Report October 2021 due

Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1] Any comments or additions are appreciated ... ## Description: The mission of PDFBox is the creation and maintenance of software related

Re: Release version 3.0.0-RC1

It was released and is available for download and was uploaded to maven central as well. But maybe you want to use the alpha2 which was released this September ;-) [1] Andreas [1] http://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html Am 30.09.21 um 07:52 schrieb Rob: Hello, Just a small question, version

Fwd: [NOTICE] - Moving and Upgrading of Buildbot Jobs

Hi, I've stumbled upon the attached mail and learned that a buildbot job for PDFBox exists [1]. I've no idea who created that job. It looks like it is limited to run the rat license check. That check is included in our maven build as well. I'm going to ask infra to delete that job if nobody o

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-alpha2 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of the second alpha release for Apache PDFBox 3.0.0. It is available for download at: https://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html The Apache PDFBox library is an open source Java tool for working with PDF documents. This is the secon

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-alpha2

Am 07.09.21 um 19:20 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-alpha2. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out. An

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-alpha2

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 3.0.0-alpha2 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/3.0.0-alpha2/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/3.0.0-alpha2/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is

Re: Next 3.0.0-alpha release?

I'm planing to cut the release next Tuesday if no one objects. Andreas Am 31.08.21 um 17:39 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, how about cutting the next PDFBox 3.0.0 alpha release, maybe in a week from now? WDYT? An

Next 3.0.0-alpha release?

Hi, how about cutting the next PDFBox 3.0.0 alpha release, maybe in a week from now? WDYT? Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org

Fwd: [NOTICE] Upcoming changes to project web sites hosted via Git

Hi, I've adjusted our website building process due to the announced changes, see below. It works but it isn't perfect. IMHO we should remove the content directory from the asf-site repo so that we can hold the newly introduced .asf.yaml file within the master repo. Andreas Weite

Invalid SNAPSHOTs deleted

Hi, due to a user posting I've learned there are some invalid SNAPSHOTs available such as 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT of components which never made it into 2.0.x and a 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT. I've deleted all of them. Cheers Andreas - To unsu

Re: Is it time for a new prerelease of pdfbox 3.0?

Am 12.08.21 um 09:21 schrieb Axel Howind: Hi, the current RC1 is now 4 months old, and I tried it right after it came out. It had a bug (PDFBOX-5159) that made it impossible to use in modularized projects. That bug was immediately fixed, but no no preview version has been released so far, so

Re: How to contribute

Hi, Am 09.08.21 um 02:59 schrieb Stephan Schwiebert: Hello, first of all, thanks for building and maintaining PdfBox! It's a really great & helpful API, and the examples & tools it comes with are awesome as well. Love it! I bumped into a few small issues (such as the problem with the clipping

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report July 2021 due

Hi, I've submitted the report as is. Thanks for the review. Andreas Am 11.07.21 um 13:11 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1

Apache PDFBox Board Report July 2021 due

Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1] Any comments or additions are appreciated ... ## Description: The mission of PDFBox is the creation and maintenance of software related

Re: Next 3.0.0-alpha release?

had a look and it looks complicated when it comes to signing and the new code for compressed object streams. Andreas Tilman Am 14.06.2021 um 08:28 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, how about cutting the next PDFBox 3.0.0 alpha release, maybe in a week from now? WDYT? Andreas P.S.: I&#x

Next 3.0.0-alpha release?

Hi, how about cutting the next PDFBox 3.0.0 alpha release, maybe in a week from now? WDYT? Andreas P.S.: I'm using "alpha" as the term "RC" led to some irritations, see [1] [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r6951212012b3c8fb306a9991a62977f7d871a56d15aecd782986efa4%40%3Cdev.pdfbox.apac

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 2.0.24 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of Apache PDFBox version 2.0.24. The release is available for download at: http://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html See the full release notes below for details about this release. Release Notes -- Apache PDFBox -- Version 2.0.24 Int

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.24

Am 07.06.21 um 18:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 2.0.24. +1 Tim Allison +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Timo Boehme +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the releas

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.24

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.24 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.24/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/2.0.24/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is 5d55b3cadbbae266d9

Re: 2.0.24 Release?

Hi, just a friendly reminder. I'm going to cut the release in about 10-12 hours from now, if nobody objects ;-) Andreas Am 25.05.21 um 08:20 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, how about cutting a 2.0.24 release in about 2 weeks from now? There is already an amount of solved tickets an

Re: 2.0.24 Release?

Am 05.06.21 um 20:09 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Thanks! I created one issue (PDFBOX-5207) but I don't consider this a blocker. The other files where column T has text have troubles related to matrix multiplication. I suspect that some parser changes produce larger numbers than before. The fil

[RESULT][VOTE] Retire Subproject Preflight

Am 27.05.21 um 08:33 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Please vote on retiring the subproject Preflight with Apache PDFBox 4.0.0. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Timo Boehme +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support! I'm going to create a ticket. An

Re: 2.0.24 Release?

Am 30.05.21 um 20:13 schrieb Tim Allison: Will kick off tests on Tuesday, June 1 unless there are other text extraction changes planned. Cool, I'm currently working on some 3.0 tickets so no interference from my side. Andreas On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 12:07 PM Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote:

Re: 2.0.24 Release?

I'm targeting the 7th or 8th of May. @Tim, @Tilman, is there any chance to run a 2.0.23 vs. 2.0.24 comparison first? Andreas Am 26.05.21 um 21:20 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: +1 Tilman Am 25.05.2021 um 08:20 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, how about cutting a 2.0.24 release in about 2

[VOTE] Retire Subproject Preflight

Hi, a discussion came up on dev@pdfbox [1] to retire Preflight and I had the impression that we already reached consensus to do so. I'd like to run a formal vote so that this topic won't get lost in some mailing list thread. Please vote on retiring the subproject Preflight with Apache PDFBo

2.0.24 Release?

Hi, how about cutting a 2.0.24 release in about 2 weeks from now? There is already an amount of solved tickets and our friends from Tika are interested in a new version as well to cut a new release too including our latest "stuff". Cheers Andreas

Re: CVE's

Hi Simon, Am 18.05.21 um 14:47 schrieb Simon Steiner: Hi, Do you have the pdf's for these so I can verify they are fixed: Yes, the files don't contain any critical data as they were created by some fuzzy logic. They are more or less garbage PDFBOX-4071: skip duplicates - CVE-2018-11797 PDFB

Re: [jira] [Resolved] (PDFBOX-5191) isEmbeddingPermitted() is too restrictive on TTFs with OS2 table versions 0-2

Hi, we didn't discused a possible 2.0.24 release but likely I'm going to cut it soon. There are still some issues we'd like to fix first Andreas Am 14.05.21 um 22:22 schrieb Larry Lynn: Hi Tilman, Thank you for your help with this issue. I see you backported the tests to the 2.0 branch

Re: Bug related to font embedding permissions in pdfbox 2.0.21+

Hi, thanks for your detailed report, it sounds valid and is very helpful!! Please create a JIRA ticket and attach a patch to it. If you prefer a PR we are able to handle that as well (add the URL of the PR to the JIRA ticket) Andreas Am 10.05.21 um 22:41 schrieb Larry Lynn: Greetings pdfb

Re: PDFBox 3.0 Top 5

Am 22.04.21 um 20:17 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: On demand parser Compressed object streams Memory management improvement Acroform improvement There are likely more ... Yes there are ;-) - lots of fixes, improvements and refactorings - switch to java 8 Andreas Tilman Am 21.04.2021 um 17:52

Re: PDFBox 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT reports

Am 16.04.21 um 01:15 schrieb Tim Allison: Diffs look suspiciously small...I may have to rerun the analyses. We simply did a good job! ;-) Andreas On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 7:08 PM Tim Allison wrote: Latest here: https://corpora.tika.apache.org/base/reports/pdfbox-3.0.0-20210415_reports.tgz

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report April 2021 due

-1/Software%20Design%20Document Thanks, good point, I've added that detail to the report Andreas Tilman Am 14.04.2021 um 08:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report

Apache PDFBox Board Report April 2021 due

Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1] Any comments or additions are appreciated ... ## Description: The mission of PDFBox is the creation and maintenance of software related

Re: On-demand parser in 3.x

Hi, Am 08.04.21 um 23:33 schrieb Tim Allison: Hi All, Two questions on 3.x... do we get the benefits of the on demand parser "for free" in 3.x...in short, eo we have to load/parse the document in a special way for the (hopefully) lower memory profile? The on demand feature is the only way to

Re: PDFBox jar files download not working

Hi, my bad, I broke the download page when reactivating the chooser for the mirrors. I've fixed it and it is already online. @Naganand Thanks for the report Andreas Am 08.04.21 um 19:24 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: He's right - When I click on https://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html and then

Naming issue with 3.0.0-RC1

Hi, when posting the announcement of 3.0.0-RC1 to announce@a.o it was rejected for the following reasons: * the message itself had to much details -> I've removed the list of tickets and replaced it with a link to the release notes * the download page contained direct download links instead o

Re: 3.0.0-RC1 regression tests?

Hi, that would be nice, I guess the last comparison is quite some time ago. Cheers Andreas Am 06.04.21 um 17:22 schrieb Tim Allison: Hi All, Would it be useful for me to run regression tests comparing 2.x with 3.0.0-RC1 now or should I wait? Or, has someone already done this? See htt

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-RC1 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of the first release candidate for Apache PDFBox 3.0.0. It is available for download at: http://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html See the full release notes below for details about this release. Release Notes -- Apache PDFBox -- Vers

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-RC1

Am 29.03.21 um 19:08 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-RC1. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Timo Boehme +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out. An

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-RC1

Hi, is there anybody eles who is able to spend some cycles on looking into the RC? There is one vote left and about 12 hours to go ... Andreas Am 29.03.21 um 19:08 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 3.0.0-RC1 release is available at:     https://dist.apache.org

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 3.0.0-RC1

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 3.0.0-RC1 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/3.0.0-RC1/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/3.0.0-RC1/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is b4ed9fec1

Re: [DISCUSS] XMPBox

s more flexible. Tilman Am 28.03.2021 um 15:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Am 28.03.21 um 15:00 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Fellow colleagues, there was some discussion about the ability of XMPBox to parse arbritary XMP which lead to PDFBOX-5128. Now, after digging into the code and aft

Re: [DISCUSS] XMPBox

Am 28.03.21 um 15:00 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Fellow colleagues, there was some discussion about the ability of XMPBox to parse arbritary XMP which lead to PDFBOX-5128. Now, after digging into the code and after reading through the various specs for XMP and PDF/A as it stands now XMPBox

Re: *** SOLVED*** Possible bug in PDFBox Creating PDF with TTF ***

Am 26.03.21 um 20:36 schrieb Jack London: Hi guys! *Thank you very very much, Tilman and Andreas!!* *Andreas was right!* But the hierarchy in Eclipse is not the same as when you use separate compilation as in your case. PDFBox uses maven as build tool and therefore the maven standard directory

Re: *** Possible bug in PDFBox Creating PDFwith TTF ***

Am 26.03.21 um 11:20 schrieb Jack London: Hi! I compiled the version pdfbox-2.0.23 source code and the following examples are not working: 1) HelloWorldTTF.java 2) CreatePDFA.java I have the following dump after trying to call the function "getExternalCMap(name);" in line 99 of file CMapParser

PDFBox 3.0.0 RC1 ??

Hi, I'd like to cut a first release candidate for 3.0.0 from the trunk. That RC is meant to be feature ready but there may be some API changes if necessary when fixing outstanding bugs or other issue we'd like to fix before releasing a final version. How about cutting the first release candi

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 2.0.23 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23. The release is available for download at: http://pdfbox.apache.org/download.html See the full release notes below for details about this release. Release Notes -- Apache PDFBox -- Version 2.0.23 Int

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.23

Am 15.03.21 um 19:44 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 2.0.23. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Tim Allison +1 Timo Boehme +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the releas

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.23

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.23 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.23/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/2.0.23/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is 9333cc6557b36d0355

2.0.23 release

Hi, just a friendly reminder, I'm going to cut the 2.0.23 release in about 10 hours from now. Cheers Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.

Re: 2.0.22 vs 2.0.23

Am 11.03.21 um 07:24 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: new report http://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.22_vs_2.0.23_5.tar.xz The content differences part is now the smallest ever, likely due to my change in tika-eval (TIKA-3314) and restoring a PDFBox code segment I accidentally deleted (

Re: 2.0.22 vs 2.0.23

Hi, @Tilman Thanks for running all those tests. The results are looking good to me, although I've to admit that I don't understand every bit of those sheets especially those about the content ;-) However, I'm planning to cut the 2.0.23 release next Monday. Andreas Am 08.03.21 um 11:17 schri

Re: test failures

Tilman is right. I reread the javadoc and my first intention was correct. "0" is never returned. However, I've simplified the code. Thanks for your input! Andreas Am 27.02.21 um 04:43 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 26.02.2021 um 15:26 schrieb Jason Pyeron: input.read(eofCheck) == 0 is not an EO

Re: test failures

adocs give caution with regards to buffer allocation based on its value. -Original Message- From: Andreas Lehmkuehler Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 2:28 AM To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org Subject: Re: test failures @Tilman Thanks for the pointer see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBO

Re: test failures

@Tilman Thanks for the pointer see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5111 Andreas Am 26.02.21 um 08:05 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Am 26.02.2021 um 07:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, I've the same effects here and I already suspected the refactored io-code. @Tilamn: Go

Re: test failures

Hi, I've the same effects here and I already suspected the refactored io-code. @Tilamn: Good to hear that you already found the culprit. Do you already have a fix or should I have a look as well? Andreas Am 26.02.21 um 07:30 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: It happens in RandomAccessReadBuffer(Inpu

Status of remaining PDFBox 3.0.0 tickets

Hi, there are just a handful of open tickets left aiming our upcoming 3.0.0 release [1]. It looks like all of them had some progress but I'm unable to decide if they are done or not. Is there any chance to update their status? Possible TODOs could be postpone by creating new tickets. @Maru

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report January 2021 due

Am 09.01.21 um 13:28 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1] Any comments or additions are appreciated ... Thanks for the rev

Apache PDFBox Board Report January 2021 due

Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1] Any comments or additions are appreciated ... ## Description: The mission of PDFBox is the creation and maintenance of software related

Re: PDFBox 3.0 Alpha Prerelease?

Am 04.01.21 um 10:07 schrieb Emmeran Seehuber: Hello everybody, if I understood it correctly you are planing to release PDFBox 3.0 in the not too distant future. Correct :-) Would you mind to provide a PDFBOX 3.0-alpha1 release in Maven Central, so that I (and possible others too) could t

Re: jaxb/activation in preflight app?

Am 22.12.20 um 17:10 schrieb Tim Allison: All, I had a colleague ask about running the preflight app with Java 11. It looks like he'll have to add the activation and jaxb jars to the class path. I don't think we need to do this with pdfbox-app. Is this intended or should we bundle the activ

[ANNOUNCE] Apache PDFBox 2.0.22 released

The Apache PDFBox community is pleased to announce the release of Apache PDFBox version 2.0.22. The release is available for download at: http://pdfbox.apache.org/download.cgi See the full release notes below for details about this release. Release Notes -- Apache PDFBox -- Version 2.0.22 Intr

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.22

Am 16.12.20 um 18:48 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Please vote on releasing this package as Apache PDFBox 2.0.22. +1 Tilman Hausherr +1 Maruan Sahyoun +1 Andreas Lehmkühler Thanks for your support and help!! I'm going to push the release out. An

[VOTE] Release Apache PDFBox 2.0.22

Hi, a candidate for the PDFBox 2.0.22 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pdfbox/2.0.22/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/pdfbox/tags/2.0.22/ The SHA-512 checksum of the archive is b9e105cdbf6b851313

Re: Xmas 2.0.22 Release?

Am 15.12.20 um 15:29 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: new report available at http://home.snafu.de/tilman/tmp/reports_pdfbox_2.0.21_vs_2.0.22.tar.xz this should be the last one. What's weird is that there are new exceptions, that happen in Jempbox. Which hasn't been changed. I can't reproduce them. I

Re: code coverage

Am 12.12.20 um 18:23 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Am Samstag, dem 12.12.2020 um 18:11 +0100 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: We have reached 50% on code coverage 😂 yes - but looking at the new code we are getting better (maybe not for code coverage that much) but @Tilman: IMHO you have to change

Re: Xmas 2.0.22 Release?

Am 14.12.20 um 10:41 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: New report available so that the fixed exceptions are no longer in stack_traces_B.xlsx Looks good to me. @Maruan & @Tilman: Thanks for the effort I'm going to cut the release on Wednesday in about 48 hours from if nobody objects. Andreas P.S.:

Fwd: [ACTION REQUIRED] Deprecation of Java <11, upgrade before February 1st!

Hi, I've switched our sonar build to java 11 to fulfill the minimum requirements. Andreas Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:[ACTION REQUIRED] Deprecation of Java <11, upgrade before February 1st! Datum: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:00:41 -0600 Von:SonarCloud Antwort an:

Re: Xmas 2.0.22 Release?

Am 03.12.20 um 18:05 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Am Donnerstag, den 03.12.2020, 17:46 +0100 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, looks like there are again a lot of unreleased fixes/improvements. How about cutting 2.0.22 in about 1-2 week from now? +1 @Tim or Tilman Does anyone of you

Xmas 2.0.22 Release?

Hi, looks like there are again a lot of unreleased fixes/improvements. How about cutting 2.0.22 in about 1-2 week from now? @Tim or Tilman Does anyone of you have the time to run the test arena? WDYT? Andreas - To unsubscri

Re: [DISCUSS] PDFBox 3.0.0

e which we can create content for in the days coming. Good idea Andreas WDYT? BR Maruan Am Donnerstag, den 05.11.2020, 12:12 +0100 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Am 03.11.20 um 20:49 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: Hi, I support having a 3.0 release because of the new parser. OK, so lets proceed wi

Re: [DISCUSS] Move static functions from COSArrayList

Am 25.12.19 um 12:57 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Am 23.12.19 um 15:54 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: I'd like to remove some of the static functions which work on/return a COSArray from COSArrayList and move these to COSArray. For 2.x I'd deprecate them. In 3.0 I'd remove them. Samp

Re: [Heads-Up] Documentation

Am 24.11.20 um 09:05 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Am Dienstag, den 24.11.2020, 08:25 +0100 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Am 22.11.20 um 21:19 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Dear Dev team, in order to provide a base to slowly enhance our documentation I'm currently working on an additi

Re: [Heads-Up] Documentation

Am 22.11.20 um 21:19 schrieb sahy...@fileaffairs.de: Dear Dev team, in order to provide a base to slowly enhance our documentation I'm currently working on an addition to our site generator which already works in my local repo. This will allow to add code snippets from our examples into the gene

Re: ossindex-maven-plugin and build issue

adds the problematic junit4 dependency. :-( I'm going to switch the trunk to junit5 if nobody objects. It shouldn't be complicated but some work to do. Andreas Am Sonntag, den 15.11.2020, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, the ossindex-maven-plugin triggers the recent

ossindex-maven-plugin and build issue

Hi, the ossindex-maven-plugin triggers the recent build issue. It complains about the junit plugin because of a vulnerability see CVE-2020-15250. Any idea on how to solve that, without deactivating the plugin? Andreas https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-15250 -

Re: [DISCUSS] PDFBox 3.0.0

Am 03.11.20 um 10:03 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Hi, Hi, Am 02.11.20 um 08:45 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Dear fellow dev colleagues, PDFBox 3.0.0 is in the works for quite some time now. Maybe for too long. Are we in a position to target a release for end of year? Maybe by also dropping all open

Re: [DISCUSS] PDFBox 3.0.0

will attract new users - PDF is a successful but 20+ year old file format that is "unsexy" for most people. We should postpone that discussion and move to a fresh thread. Andreas Tilman Am 03.11.2020 um 08:40 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, Am 02.11.20 um 08:45 schrieb Maruan Sahyou

Re: [DISCUSS] PDFBox 3.0.0

Hi, Am 02.11.20 um 08:45 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Dear fellow dev colleagues, PDFBox 3.0.0 is in the works for quite some time now. Maybe for too long. Are we in a position to target a release for end of year? Maybe by also dropping all open issues which do not have to go into the release but

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-4895) Faster COSNumber

Am 28.10.20 um 20:04 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Am 28.10.20 um 19:58 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Am 28.10.20 um 17:40 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Hi Andreas svn -> done JIRA copy over -> done delete from wrong ticket -> no permission Did you try to reopen the ticket? I can only delete

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-4895) Faster COSNumber

Am 28.10.20 um 19:58 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Am 28.10.20 um 17:40 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Hi Andreas svn -> done JIRA copy over -> done delete from wrong ticket -> no permission Did you try to reopen the ticket? I can only delete comments I made - looked at other open tickets - so th

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-4895) Faster COSNumber

Am 28.10.20 um 17:40 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Hi Andreas svn -> done JIRA copy over -> done delete from wrong ticket -> no permission Did you try to reopen the ticket? Thank you Andreas. Maruan Am 28.10.20 um 16:07 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Sorry - that commit went to the wrong issue

Re: [jira] [Commented] (PDFBOX-4895) Faster COSNumber

Am 28.10.20 um 16:07 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: Sorry - that commit went to the wrong issue - is there a way to correct that? This has to be done manually: change the svn log message and copy the JIRA comment from the wrong ticket to the correct one, delete the comment from the wrong ticket HT

Re: Apache PDFBox Board Report October 2020 due

Hi, thanks for your reviews. I've submitted the report as is. Andreas Am 11.10.20 um 19:09 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler: Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1

Apache PDFBox Board Report October 2020 due

Hi, find attached a quick draft of the board report we're expected to submit this month. It's based upon the report wizard template which can be found at [1] Any comments or additions are appreciated ... ## Description: The mission of PDFBox is the creation and maintenance of software related

Re: jdk16 build

Am 03.10.20 um 15:45 schrieb Tilman Hausherr: I've renamed the jdk14 build and reconfigured it as a jdk16 build, and it works. Cool, thanks for the effort Tilman - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org

Re: Download link via download.cgi

Am 06.10.20 um 17:44 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: having worked on the download page I saw that the links are generated using download.cgi. Looking at other projects such as Apache Lucene or Apache Camel they are using /dyn/closer ... Is there are preferred solution to this i.e. shall we also use /d

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >