Hi,
You can compile with the api in 18 fine, just the feature cant be used. We use
it to lock down the application on a server.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: axh
Sent: 19 March 2023 09:38
To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org
Subject: Re: Minimum Java version for PDFBox 3.x
Hi,
why do you
I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-5576 to not forget
about this ;-)
Andreas
Am 18.03.23 um 18:07 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
Fine - so let‘s target that for 4x
Am 18.03.2023 um 16:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler :
Am 18.03.23 um 10:49 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
I‘d second
).
> Am 19.03.2023 um 09:41 schrieb Simon Steiner :
>
> Hi,
>
> We still need to use securitymanager on java 11/17, so you would need to keep
> those.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Original Message-
> From: axh
> Sent: 18 March 2023 17:14
> To: dev@pdfbo
Hi,
We still need to use securitymanager on java 11/17, so you would need to keep
those.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: axh
Sent: 18 March 2023 17:14
To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org
Subject: Re: Minimum Java version for PDFBox 3.x
> Am 18.03.2023 um 16:47 schrieb Andreas Lehmkueh
> Am 18.03.2023 um 16:47 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler :
>
> Am 17.03.23 um 23:40 schrieb axh:
>> - functionality available in newer versions of the JDK does not have to be
>> reproduced and later maintained
> Do you have a specific example in your mind?
Much of the IOUtils class is obsolete
Fine - so let‘s target that for 4x
> Am 18.03.2023 um 16:51 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler :
>
> Am 18.03.23 um 10:49 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
>> I‘d second a move to 11 for 3.x as for the lifetime of 3.x this will enable
>> us to use newer funtions without another major release.
> I'd like to do
Am 18.03.23 um 10:13 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
You may have a point with some of your arguments, but not this one:
Public updates for Java 8 have stopped in march 2022, now one year ago
My latest jdk8 is from January 17th of this year. (Amazon Corretto)
About the difficulty to find
Am 18.03.23 um 10:49 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
I‘d second a move to 11 for 3.x as for the lifetime of 3.x this will enable us
to use newer funtions without another major release.
I'd like to do so for the next major version 4.0.x. Hopefully it won't take us
that much time to release that version
developing a software that relies heavily on Apache PdfBox. It uses the
current the current PDFBox 3.0.0 from trunk, with some patches.
I wanted to know what your thoughts are about raising the minimum Java version for
PDFBox 3.x to Java 11. I know some might say "we are
I‘d second a move to 11 for 3.x as for the lifetime of 3.x this will enable us
to use newer funtions without another major release.
BR
Maruan
> Am 18.03.2023 um 10:13 schrieb Tilman Hausherr :
>
> You may have a point with some of your arguments, but not this one:
>> Public updates for Java 8
You may have a point with some of your arguments, but not this one:
Public updates for Java 8 have stopped in march 2022, now one year ago
My latest jdk8 is from January 17th of this year. (Amazon Corretto)
About the difficulty to find contributors - this has always been
difficult. That's
e that relies heavily on Apache PdfBox. It uses the
>> current the current PDFBox 3.0.0 from trunk, with some patches.
>> I wanted to know what your thoughts are about raising the minimum Java
>> version for PDFBox 3.x to Java 11. I know some might say "we are still on
>
Am 17.03.23 um 10:09 schrieb axh:
Hi,
I am developing a software that relies heavily on Apache PdfBox. It uses the
current the current PDFBox 3.0.0 from trunk, with some patches.
I wanted to know what your thoughts are about raising the minimum Java version for
PDFBox 3.x to Java 11. I know
Hi,
I am developing a software that relies heavily on Apache PdfBox. It uses the
current the current PDFBox 3.0.0 from trunk, with some patches.
I wanted to know what your thoughts are about raising the minimum Java version
for PDFBox 3.x to Java 11. I know some might say "we are still o
14 matches
Mail list logo
