> On 24 Mar 2015, at 11:44, Maruan Sahyoun wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> Am 24.03.2015 um 19:25 schrieb John Hewson :
>>
>>
>>> On 19 Mar 2015, at 02:49, Maruan Sahyoun wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm about to start to enhance the documentation for PDFBox 2.0.0 with the
>>> initial step to enhance the java
Hi John,
> Am 24.03.2015 um 19:25 schrieb John Hewson :
>
>
>> On 19 Mar 2015, at 02:49, Maruan Sahyoun wrote:
>>
>> I'm about to start to enhance the documentation for PDFBox 2.0.0 with the
>> initial step to enhance the javadoc files (also covering xmpbox, preflight,
>> fontbox).
>>
>> C
> On 19 Mar 2015, at 02:49, Maruan Sahyoun wrote:
>
> I'm about to start to enhance the documentation for PDFBox 2.0.0 with the
> initial step to enhance the javadoc files (also covering xmpbox, preflight,
> fontbox).
>
> Currently we have a rule - at least in Checkstyle - that a method retu
> Am 19.03.2015 um 18:37 schrieb Tilman Hausherr :
>
> John once mentioned that "Returns xxx" is legit according to an Oracle java
> style guide. My own IDE (which is developed by Oracle) brings out a warning.
>
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/documentation/index-137868.html#@re
Hi,
Am 19.03.2015 um 10:49 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
I'm about to start to enhance the documentation for PDFBox 2.0.0 with the
initial step to enhance the javadoc files (also covering xmpbox, preflight,
fontbox).
Currently we have a rule - at least in Checkstyle - that a method returning a
non
John once mentioned that "Returns xxx" is legit according to an Oracle
java style guide. My own IDE (which is developed by Oracle) brings out a
warning.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/documentation/index-137868.html#@return
Tilman
Am 19.03.2015 um 10:49 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
