Am 20.09.22 um 20:23 schrieb Tim Allison:
PS thanks for doing the test!
Thank _you_ for the confirmation! Onwards!
Thanks to both of you for running the test and checking the results.
I'm planing to cut the release next Monday if no one objects.
Andreas
--
>PS thanks for doing the test!
Thank _you_ for the confirmation! Onwards!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
On 20.09.2022 19:21, Tilman Hausherr wrote:
On 20.09.2022 14:42, Tim Allison wrote:
As confirmation, did we expect more diffs/ did I botch the runs and
compare the same version? There are a few _diffs_ at least.
😂
positive things do happen sometimes. There were 2 diffs (which were
improveme
On 20.09.2022 14:42, Tim Allison wrote:
As confirmation, did we expect more diffs/ did I botch the runs and
compare the same version? There are a few _diffs_ at least.
😂
positive things do happen sometimes. There were 2 diffs (which were
improvements!) so I believe the run was correct.
htt
As confirmation, did we expect more diffs/ did I botch the runs and
compare the same version? There are a few _diffs_ at least.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 8:41 AM Tim Allison wrote:
>
> Reports are here:
> https://corpora.tika.apache.org/base/reports/pdfbox-2.0.27-pre-rc.tgz
>
> Looks good to me...
Reports are here:
https://corpora.tika.apache.org/base/reports/pdfbox-2.0.27-pre-rc.tgz
Looks good to me...
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 12:35 AM Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote:
>
> Thanks in advance, whoever will be faster ;-)
>
> We are not in a hurry, I'll wait for the results.
>
> Andreas
>
> Am 19.09
Thanks in advance, whoever will be faster ;-)
We are not in a hurry, I'll wait for the results.
Andreas
Am 19.09.22 um 21:09 schrieb Tim Allison:
I should have time tomorrow/Wednesday. Thank you!
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 2:30 PM Tilman Hausherr wrote:
On 19.09.2022 08:22, Andreas Lehmkuehl
I should have time tomorrow/Wednesday. Thank you!
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 2:30 PM Tilman Hausherr wrote:
>
> On 19.09.2022 08:22, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote:
> > 1.8.17 is out of the door and I guess it is time for 2.0.27 release.
> >
> > @Tim or @Tilman
> > Is there any chance to run the regress
On 19.09.2022 08:22, Andreas Lehmkuehler wrote:
1.8.17 is out of the door and I guess it is time for 2.0.27 release.
@Tim or @Tilman
Is there any chance to run the regressions tests any time soon?
Andreas
I could try on friday or on saturday.
Tilman
--
Am 10.09.22 um 17:30 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
Am 08.09.22 um 16:12 schrieb Eloisa Costa:
Hello!
We're having an issue converting some PDF pages to JPG and opened a ticket
with you. The fix was made in a May version (2.0.27-Snapshot) that was not
released yet.
We would like to know if you ha
Am 08.09.22 um 16:12 schrieb Eloisa Costa:
Hello!
We're having an issue converting some PDF pages to JPG and opened a ticket
with you. The fix was made in a May version (2.0.27-Snapshot) that was not
released yet.
We would like to know if you have any release date for the new version, as
we use
Hello!
We're having an issue converting some PDF pages to JPG and opened a ticket
with you. The fix was made in a May version (2.0.27-Snapshot) that was not
released yet.
We would like to know if you have any release date for the new version, as
we use maven to update our dependencies.
Best regar
12 matches
Mail list logo