Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

On Sun, 31 Dec 2000, John K Sterling wrote: > FYI - > i pulled down the HEAD and tested it. > all worked great. sweet. miller time! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

FYI - i pulled down the HEAD and tested it. all worked great. sterling Doug MacEachern wrote: > ok, i have done: perl -pi -e 's/\cM//' mod_perl.dsp > and committed. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additi

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

- Original Message - From: "John K Sterling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Doug MacEachern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Randy Kobes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 2:29 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix > > thanks, works like a c

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

ok, i have done: perl -pi -e 's/\cM//' mod_perl.dsp and committed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

- Original Message - From: "Doug MacEachern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "John K Sterling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Randy Kobes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2000 1:38 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix > ok, i've added it as a n

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

ok, i've added it as a normal text file. randy, do you need to strip out the ^M's ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

> thanks, works like a charm. curious, should mod_perl.dsp be cvs add-ed > with -kb? i seem to recall cvs changing the file (stripping ^M's ?) welp, i've always had a problem when those ^M's are there - i don't think that file should be binary - when i pull from cvs on win32 that .dsp file (Apa

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

thanks, works like a charm. curious, should mod_perl.dsp be cvs add-ed with -kb? i seem to recall cvs changing the file (stripping ^M's ?) i also added mod_perl.def to the MANIFEST, we don't want to include mod_perl.mak or do we?

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

how does this work for you? this includes my change to INSTALL.win32 sterling Doug MacEachern wrote: > sweet, great work guys. the patch i have from randy seems to be truncated > (the tarball with mod_perl.{dsp,mak.def} looks ok though. sterls can you > send me the current patch against curr

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

sweet, great work guys. the patch i have from randy seems to be truncated (the tarball with mod_perl.{dsp,mak.def} looks ok though. sterls can you send me the current patch against current cvs? thanks! - To unsubscribe, e-ma

Re: uselargefiles

On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I assume that if Apache is built with LFS, we do need them (though I > think apxs will take care of that). What about if perl is - can we > really get away without not using LFS when perl is? we can get away with it because Perl never passes lfs

Re: [PATCH] win32 module names now like unix

Sorry about the delay -- finally got a second to breath and test out this patch randy. It looks great - +1 on a commit before 1.25 doug. one nitpick - INSTALL.win32:95 still references ApacheModulePerl.dll i like the message at the end of running perl Makefile.PL explaining the name change.