> modperl_util.c:306: `apr_os_dso_handle_t' undeclared (first use in this
...
> looks like some a sync with httpd-2.0 is missing... Thanks!
like maybe you forgot to 'make install' ?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * checked out httpd-2.0 from scratch and now it works. I suppose that
> 'make distclean' is not very clean, since with 'cvs up' + 'make distclean'
> the error didn't go away.
>
You probably didn't update srclib/apr first. Any changes to the *.m4 or
*.in files won't work until both httpd-2.0 a
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Ken Williams wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stas Bekman) wrote:
> > I get:
> >
> >../configure --prefix=$HOME/httpd-2.0 --with-mpm=threaded --enable-so
> >creating cache ./config.cache
> >../configure: line 950: syntax error near unexpected token
> >`APR_SAVE_THE_ENVIRONMENT(CPP
Ok, so I've the latest httpd built and I've the latest mod_perl 2.0:
cc -I/home/stas/apache.org/modperl-2.0/src/modules/perl
-I/home/stas/apache.org/modperl-2.0/xs -I/home/stas/httpd-2.0/include
-D_REENTRANT -DDEBUGGING -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include
-I/home/stas/perl-5.6.1/lib/5.6.1/i
[crossposting to new-httpd]
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > ./configure --prefix=$HOME/httpd-2.0 --with-mpm=threaded --enable-so
> > creating cache ./config.cache
> > ./configure: line 950: syntax error near unexpected token
> > `APR_SA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stas Bekman) wrote:
> I get:
>
>../configure --prefix=$HOME/httpd-2.0 --with-mpm=threaded --enable-so
>creating cache ./config.cache
>../configure: line 950: syntax error near unexpected token
>`APR_SAVE_THE_ENVIRONMENT(CPPFLAGS)'
>../configure: line 950: `APR_SAVE_THE_ENVIRONME
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> ./configure --prefix=$HOME/httpd-2.0 --with-mpm=threaded --enable-so
> creating cache ./config.cache
> ./configure: line 950: syntax error near unexpected token
> `APR_SAVE_THE_ENVIRONMENT(CPPFLAGS)'
> ./configure: line 950: `APR_SAVE_THE_ENVIRONMENT(CPP
> Ok, got back to playing with this today: looks like the default CFLAGS
> setting for autoconf (created by AC_PROG_CC) is "-g -O2". That seems
> like an odd combination to me, but it's as-installed on two RedHats and
> a FreeBSD.
Yes, that is the standard "reasonable default" per the Gnu projec
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > Do you guys get to compile httpd-2.0 recently? My cvs co version fails
> > with
>
> yes.
>
> > /bin/sh /home/stas/apache.org/httpd-2.0/libtool --silent --mode=compile
> > gcc -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_RE
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Do you guys get to compile httpd-2.0 recently? My cvs co version fails
> with
yes.
> /bin/sh /home/stas/apache.org/httpd-2.0/libtool --silent --mode=compile
> gcc -DLINUX=2 -D_REENTRANT -D_REENTRANT -pthread
> -I/home/stas/apache.org/httpd-2.0/inc
On Thu, 10 May 2001, barries wrote:
> [cross-posting to new-httpd, since that's the more appropriate forum]
>
> Background: I had trouble single-stepping through the routine defined by
>
>AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_ALL(int,pre_connection,(conn_rec *c),(c),OK,DECLINED)
seems like the rest of you
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> hi again...
>
> ok, I've been working on a way to make a proper Makefile.PL that warns at
> 'make test' if you don't have Apache::Test installed.
>
> it's probably my meager understanding of ExtUtils and make, but this is
> all I could find that
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > Any idea of why do I get these cvs failures once in a while with 2.0 cvs
> > tree? I've to kill the whole tree and check it out from scratch :(
>
> not sure, i guess its something todo with new directories
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Any idea of why do I get these cvs failures once in a while with 2.0 cvs
> tree? I've to kill the whole tree and check it out from scratch :(
not sure, i guess its something todo with new directories. though i would
expect your cvs client to properly de
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Bjarni R. Einarsson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope I'm sending this to the right list, and apologize in
> advance if I'm making a mistake. I have made a minor modification
> to the Apache::Registry.pm module, which I wanted to share with
> the list in case you developers thought it
[cross-posting to new-httpd, since that's the more appropriate forum]
Background: I had trouble single-stepping through the routine defined by
AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_ALL(int,pre_connection,(conn_rec *c),(c),OK,DECLINED)
.
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:21:25PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
>
>
hi again...
ok, I've been working on a way to make a proper Makefile.PL that warns at
'make test' if you don't have Apache::Test installed.
it's probably my meager understanding of ExtUtils and make, but this is
all I could find that worked:
eval {
require Apache::TestMM;
Apache::TestMM
17 matches
Mail list logo
