Doug MacEachern wrote:
> MPXS_ functions are not supposed to be picked up by source_scan. they are
> supposed to be thin wrappers around the real functions that actually do
> the work. the real functions are what get picked up by source_scan.
that's not the problem. The problem is that the xs
MPXS_ functions are not supposed to be picked up by source_scan. they are
supposed to be thin wrappers around the real functions that actually do
the work. the real functions are what get picked up by source_scan.
-
To unsubsc
Gerald Richter wrote:
>
>>I think I've tried all the combinations of possible ways to declare a
>>function in the map file, but in vain -- it won't be picked by the
>>source scan.
>>
>>
>
> Source scan doesn't look at the maps files at all. Source scan only scans
> the h files. Inside of Apache
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Gerald Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after having lots of iteration to get the RecDescent parser to not only
> most, but all of the Apache functions/structures parsered I am now moveing
> to the code generation side. This part I already have abtracted in a common
> base class and
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Not sure what just happen, but I started getting this all over the
> place:
>
> gcc -c ... -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.0/i386-linux/CORE Base64.c
^
those warnings didn't go away until after 5.6.1 in bleedperl.
btw,
> I think I've tried all the combinations of possible ways to declare a
> function in the map file, but in vain -- it won't be picked by the
> source scan.
>
Source scan doesn't look at the maps files at all. Source scan only scans
the h files. Inside of Apache/ModPerl::ParseSource there are a
> Ah, I know what's going on. I have one handler defined at the top level
> (outside any container) and one defined in that particular .
>
>> From what I read in mod_perl source, at merge time the latter replaces
>
> the former. So I guess I should either declare them both at the same level,
>
--On mardi 27 novembre 2001 09:53 -0500 Geoffrey Young
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Eric Cholet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:53 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Multiple PostReadRequest handlers
>>
>>
>> Is it possib
I think I've tried all the combinations of possible ways to declare a
function in the map file, but in vain -- it won't be picked by the
source scan.
What I try to add is something like this:
Index: xs/maps/modperl_functions.map
=
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Cholet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 7:53 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Multiple PostReadRequest handlers
>
>
> Is it possible to have several PostReadRequest handlers
> run for a request? I have an issue where I
Is it possible to have several PostReadRequest handlers
run for a request? I have an issue where I define two
of them but only the second one is being run.
Maybe this is a matter of the return code of the handlers?
This is under mod_perl 1.x/apache 1.x
--
Eric Cholet
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
