Re: back compatibility layer for method handlers?

2002-01-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
Stas Bekman wrote: > Doug MacEachern wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: >> >> >>> A "method handler" is now specified using the `method' sub attribute, >>> e.g. >>> >>> sub handler : method {}; >>> >>> instead of 1.xx's >>> >>> sub handler ($$) {} >>> >> >> there's no need to

Re: back compatibility layer for method handlers?

2002-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>A "method handler" is now specified using the `method' sub attribute, e.g. >> >>sub handler : method {}; >> >>instead of 1.xx's >> >>sub handler ($$) {} >> > > there's no need to support that in 2.0, since 1.x has supported

Re: back compatibility layer for method handlers?

2002-01-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
Doug MacEachern wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > > > A "method handler" is now specified using the `method' sub attribute, e.g. > > > > > > sub handler : method {}; > > > > well, I submitted a patch to get this to work in 1.3. > > huh? that

Re: back compatibility layer for method handlers?

2002-01-21 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Geoffrey Young wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > A "method handler" is now specified using the `method' sub attribute, e.g. > > > > sub handler : method {}; > > well, I submitted a patch to get this to work in 1.3. huh? that isn't what your patch does. in any case, i'

Re: back compatibility layer for method handlers?

2002-01-21 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Stas Bekman wrote: > A "method handler" is now specified using the `method' sub attribute, e.g. > > sub handler : method {}; > > instead of 1.xx's > > sub handler ($$) {} there's no need to support that in 2.0, since 1.x has supported the method attribute for nearly 2 yea

Re: back compatibility layer for method handlers?

2002-01-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
Geoffrey Young wrote: > > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > A "method handler" is now specified using the `method' sub attribute, e.g. > > > > sub handler : method {}; > > well, I submitted a patch to get this to work in 1.3. last I > remember, doug was looking it over to make sure it didn't have any

Re: Apache.pm Documentation patch

2002-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Issac Goldstand wrote: > This patch adds documentation for $r->location Thanks Issac, committed. _ Stas Bekman JAm_pH -- Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide http://perl.apach

Apache.pm Documentation patch

2002-01-21 Thread Issac Goldstand
This patch adds documentation for $r->location Issac *** Apache.pm.orig Mon Jan 21 15:22:29 2002 --- Apache.pm Mon Jan 21 15:42:49 2002 *** *** 390,395 --- 390,399 filename> translation, optionally changing it with the first argument if you happen to be doing

Re: back compatibility layer for method handlers?

2002-01-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
Stas Bekman wrote: > > A "method handler" is now specified using the `method' sub attribute, e.g. > > sub handler : method {}; well, I submitted a patch to get this to work in 1.3. last I remember, doug was looking it over to make sure it didn't have any leaks. you could always commit it, whi