Re: syncing the site docs with modperl-1.x

2002-04-24 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 15:02 24.04.2002, Stas Bekman wrote: >Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > >>All the other Apache:: core modules docs have been integrated into the >>site and changed style there too. Should these be re-submitted into the core? > >What we can do is to go the modperl-2.0 way for modperl-1.0, i.e. strip

syncing the site docs with modperl-1.x

2002-04-24 Thread Stas Bekman
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > All the other Apache:: core modules docs have been integrated into the > site and changed style there too. Should these be re-submitted into the > core? What we can do is to go the modperl-2.0 way for modperl-1.0, i.e. strip the pm files from pod and let the modper

Re: [PATCH] Apache::Constants docs

2002-04-24 Thread Geoffrey Young
>> personally, I think that FORBIDDEN() is just as bad as $FORBIDDEN - >> it's removing the constant idea behind constant subroutines (though >> sometimes you just have to do things that way to get past the compiler >> or whatnot). it's a matter of personal choice, I suppose... > > > Yes, I

Re: [PATCH] Apache::Constants docs

2002-04-24 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
At 14:28 24.04.2002, Geoffrey Young wrote: >>Hi, >>After some discussion on the mod_perl list with Perrin Harkins, it seemed >>to me like it would be goot having a warning about problems with using >>constant subroutines (in hash constructs, where barewords get >>stringified, etc). > >the warni

Re: [PATCH] Apache::Build, Apache::TestConfig

2002-04-24 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
Stas told me we didn't want any more dependencies, so I cancel this patch and resubmit and other one which does the same only inline in Build.pm. At 13:28 19.04.2002, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: >I've created a File::Which module for use for the mod_perl site and which >exports a which() functi

Re: [PATCH] Apache::Constants docs

2002-04-24 Thread Geoffrey Young
Per Einar Ellefsen wrote: > > Hi, > > After some discussion on the mod_perl list with Perrin Harkins, it > seemed to me like it would be goot having a warning about problems with > using constant subroutines (in hash constructs, where barewords get > stringified, etc). the warning looks g

[PATCH] Apache::Constants docs

2002-04-24 Thread Per Einar Ellefsen
Hi, After some discussion on the mod_perl list with Perrin Harkins, it seemed to me like it would be goot having a warning about problems with using constant subroutines (in hash constructs, where barewords get stringified, etc). I added this, and as the docs have also been ported to the new