On Tue, 21 May 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I was digging at p5p archives and asking about the status of
> compile-time method lookup optimization. The 2.0 design doc talk about
> this feature as to be added to 5.8, but I understand that this is not
> the case. Doug, can you please tell what's th
I was digging at p5p archives and asking about the status of
compile-time method lookup optimization. The 2.0 design doc talk about
this feature as to be added to 5.8, but I understand that this is not
the case. Doug, can you please tell what's the status of this feature?
Thanks a lot!
---
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Randy Kobes wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >I was having problems on Win32 when building mod_perl-2 (with
> > > the latest cvs modperl-2/httpd-2 sources) with the generated
> > > t/conf/
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Per Einar Ellefsen wrote:
looks good, applied to cvs, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >I was having problems on Win32 when building mod_perl-2 (with
> > the latest cvs modperl-2/httpd-2 sources) with the generated
> > t/conf/httpd.conf - some needed modules weren't being loaded (eg,
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
the cvs version of modperl compiles w/ bleedperl on win32 as of a week or
two ago. bleedperl has many ithread fixes/improvements over 5.6.1,
looking forward to 5.8.x becoming stable.
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Are these functions:
>
> ap_hard_timeout();
> ap_kill_timeout();
>
> simply to be removed when porting from 1.x to 2.x? httpd-dev didn't
> answer my question, I'm not sure what's the right thing to do. I've
> compared mod_cgi from 1.x and 2.x, and it lo
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Alessandro Forghieri wrote:
> Greetings.
> I guess this qualifies as dumb question however:
>
> i) will the interpreter feature work on Win32 AS perl? (-dUSEITHREADS)
>[I guess no - the doc says it needs -DUSETHREADS]
yes, AS implemented ithreads and enable it in all th
Is mod_perl 2.0 going to use the triplets version format:
2.0.1, 2.0.2, ... or the same as 1x? 2.1, 2.2, etc.
I ask because I'm not sure if I should say:
In the future mod_perl 2.0 versions the following features are planned
to be added. (implying 2.0.1, 2.0.2...)
or
In the future mod_perl 2.
