David Wheeler wrote:
> I think a bug report makes sense regardless.
Done, it is #22805: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22805
Thanks,
Radu Greab
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
Geoffrey Young wrote:
can anyone verify this?
Haven't we resolved it? Craig, do you still have a problem with the latest cvs?
Original Message
Subject: Re: SubRequest in Filter MP2 [QUESTION]
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:05:14 +0100
From: Craig Shelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Geoffr
can anyone verify this?
--Geoff
Original Message
Subject: Re: SubRequest in Filter MP2 [QUESTION]
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:05:14 +0100
From: Craig Shelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PR
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi again :)
this diff includes all the apr_socket_* changes I could find. it
also includes the patch I just sent since the same files are touched.
at any rate, I'll stop now until the work so far is reviewed and
committed :)
+1 on both patches
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi
I'm going through the apr source in 2.0.46 looking for deprecated
functions.
why 2.0.46 and not the current cvs? Or are you planning to use the
Changes log from 2.0.46 onwards to get any changes that happened after
2.0.46?
well, since 2.0.46 i
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi
I'm going through the apr source in 2.0.46 looking for deprecated
functions.
why 2.0.46 and not the current cvs? Or are you planning to use the Changes log
from 2.0.46 onwards to get any changes that happened after 2.0.46?
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi again :)
this diff includes all the apr_socket_* changes I could find. it also
includes the patch I just sent since the same files are touched. at any
rate, I'll stop now until the work so far is reviewed and committed :)
+1 on both patches
Geoff, there is no point
On Wednesday, August 27, 2003, at 09:28 AM, Radu Greab wrote:
I'm glad (OK, I've spent half a day on this) I haven't followed the
suggestion in Bricolage docs to use Apache 1.3.27, but went with
Apache 1.3.28. Today I stepped on the same issue like you have and I
have found the cause of it.
Radu,
hi again :)
this diff includes all the apr_socket_* changes I could find. it also
includes the patch I just sent since the same files are touched. at any
rate, I'll stop now until the work so far is reviewed and committed :)
--Geoff
Index: xs/APR/Socket/APR__Socket.h
===
Stas Bekman wrote:
As mike chamberlain told me over irc, apr-ext/perlio was faling for him
because of the modperl_perl_gensym not being resolved in APR/PerlIO.so.
I didn't see that error since on linux by default symbols resolution is
lazy and since that part of the api wasn't tested I did see
hi
I'm going through the apr source in 2.0.46 looking for deprecated
functions. stas has provided a list, and apr gives the pending_renames
file, but I'm still going through file by file looking for stuff.
anyway, here is the first sync patch, covering changes in
memory/unix/apr_pools.c (
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 02:11:59PM +0800, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 16:25, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> > > Dunno where they all went in the past, but as Stas reminded me, I am
> > > still holding off on 2 OpenBSD-related patches to make sure
12 matches
Mail list logo
