Re: Apache::FakeTable

2003-09-04 Thread David Wheeler
On Tuesday, September 2, 2003, at 03:08 PM, Stas Bekman wrote: Hopefully you can read C without understanding it ;) All it does is having a counter which tracks where it is inside the hash entry's list. so when you call FETCH it uses that index to get the right > value. Managed to do it without

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/xs/maps apr_functions.map

2003-09-04 Thread Geoffrey Young
Currently APR::Pool::new() can create only parent pools, since it calls apr_pool_create which is defined as: #define apr_pool_create(newpool, parent) \ apr_pool_create_ex(newpool, parent, NULL, NULL) We probably will need to provide functionality to create sub-pools, either by extending the

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/xs/maps apr_functions.map

2003-09-04 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: geoff 2003/09/04 09:39:44 Modified:xs/maps apr_functions.map Log: remove deprecated apr_pool_sub_make in that case shouldn't be the replacement function apr_pool_create_ex be enabled? I suppose it was disable

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/xs/maps apr_functions.map

2003-09-04 Thread Geoffrey Young
Stas Bekman wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: geoff 2003/09/04 09:39:44 Modified:xs/maps apr_functions.map Log: remove deprecated apr_pool_sub_make in that case shouldn't be the replacement function apr_pool_create_ex be enabled? I suppose it was disabled because the apr_pool_

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/xs/maps apr_functions.map

2003-09-04 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: geoff 2003/09/04 09:39:44 Modified:xs/maps apr_functions.map Log: remove deprecated apr_pool_sub_make in that case shouldn't be the replacement function apr_pool_create_ex be enabled? I suppose it was disabled because the apr_pool_sub_make wrapper existed