Re: [mp2] segfaults when using "include" filter w/mod_perl

2003-11-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Tyler 'Crackerjack' MacDonald wrote: Hello, Thanks for taking the time to look at this: Thanks for reporting this Tyler, I'm looking at this issue, though I may come back to you only on Thu, once I'm back from ApacheCon. __ Stas Be

Re: [Fwd: mod_perl-1.99_11 on HP-UX 11.22]

2003-11-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: forwarding this to where this message belongs Original Message Subject: mod_perl-1.99_11 on HP-UX 11.22 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:16:49 -0800 (PST) From: TJ Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Stas. I'm building mod_perl-1.99_11 using Apa

[Fwd: mod_perl-1.99_11 on HP-UX 11.22]

2003-11-18 Thread Stas Bekman
forwarding this to where this message belongs Original Message Subject: mod_perl-1.99_11 on HP-UX 11.22 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:16:49 -0800 (PST) From: TJ Saunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Stas. I'm building mod_perl-1.99_11 using Apache 2.0.48 and perl

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/response/TestAPR finfo.pm

2003-11-18 Thread Randy Kobes
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > If you do see bill rowe, > > it would be good to know if he knows about this - there was > > a post on the apr-dev list on 2003-01-10 (that he responded > > to) about a patch to set both info.name and info.fname on > > Win32, but it looks like that th

Re: mod_perl segfaults when also using mod_rewrite

2003-11-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: gdb> run -DONE_PROCESS -DNO_DETATCH If a worker/winnt mpm, then: gdb> run -DONE_PROCESS -DNO_DETATCH -DPERL_USEITHREADS I need to learn to spell, please perl -pi -e 's|DETATCH|DETACH|g' << THIS_MESSAGE __ Stas B

Re: mod_perl segfaults when also using mod_rewrite

2003-11-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Aaron Paetznick wrote: When I do that, the port doesn't even seem to open. Here's what I do: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_perl-1.99_11]# gdb /usr/local/www/apache-2.0.48/bin/httpd GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (5.2.1-4) Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU Gener

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/response/TestAPR finfo.pm

2003-11-18 Thread Geoffrey Young
If you do see bill rowe, it would be good to know if he knows about this - there was a post on the apr-dev list on 2003-01-10 (that he responded to) about a patch to set both info.name and info.fname on Win32, but it looks like that there were some problems with the patch. I just spent 30 minutes w

Re: mod_perl segfaults when also using mod_rewrite

2003-11-18 Thread Aaron Paetznick
When I do that, the port doesn't even seem to open. Here's what I do: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_perl-1.99_11]# gdb /usr/local/www/apache-2.0.48/bin/httpd GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (5.2.1-4) Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/response/TestAPR finfo.pm

2003-11-18 Thread Randy Kobes
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > However, the fact that the $r->finfo->fname returns undef on > > Win32 is something that should be tracked down. At the > > moment I don't see where the trouble lies, as it's statting > > the right file; it's just that the name isn't getting > > recor

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/response/TestAPR finfo.pm

2003-11-18 Thread Geoffrey Young
Geoffrey Young wrote: However, the fact that the $r->finfo->fname returns undef on Win32 is something that should be tracked down. At the moment I don't see where the trouble lies, as it's statting the right file; it's just that the name isn't getting recorded. oh, I missed that - yes, that ou

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/response/TestAPR finfo.pm

2003-11-18 Thread Geoffrey Young
However, the fact that the $r->finfo->fname returns undef on Win32 is something that should be tracked down. At the moment I don't see where the trouble lies, as it's statting the right file; it's just that the name isn't getting recorded. oh, I missed that - yes, that ought to be tracked down. a

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/response/TestAPR finfo.pm

2003-11-18 Thread Randy Kobes
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Geoffrey Young wrote: > Randy Kobes wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > >>>I dunno, but I am afraid that stuff like device, inode, > >>>nlink and such might not work similarly on non-Unixes.. > >>>These tests most likely need to be a bit more > >>>OS-sp

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/response/TestAPR finfo.pm

2003-11-18 Thread Geoffrey Young
Randy Kobes wrote: On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Geoffrey Young wrote: I dunno, but I am afraid that stuff like device, inode, nlink and such might not work similarly on non-Unixes.. These tests most likely need to be a bit more OS-specific to avoid failures on those OSes yes, I meant to follow this up