Ian Holsman wrote:
can you submit a bug-report for this?
I think the echo & str_con test failures are known problems.
(they have to do with non-blocking/blocking sockets, and what state
they are open in)
Yes, these two:
t/filter/both_str_con_add.t
t/protocol/echo_filter.t
are known and Joe promi
Ian Holsman wrote:
I had some issues when I ran a 'make test' on the
t/filter/both_str_con_add test..
it caused the httpd process to grow to 1.7g of memory when I ran it.
My make test shows :
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
Stas Bekman wrote:
Carl, please try the current cvs, we have found what was the issue with
Ian and I committed a version that doesn't complain for him or me and
hopefully should work for you too! Thanks.
compiled fine!
Carl
Carl, please try the current cvs, we have found what was the issue with Ian
and I committed a version that doesn't complain for him or me and hopefully
should work for you too! Thanks.
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Jus
Carl Brewer wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
> I forgot that SvPV is a macro too, and it turns its len argument into
&len, hence the error. I'm not happy about introducing a temp variable
and copy the values in a tight loop just because of some issue on
netbsd. I'm trying to get hold of Ian Holsman (
Stas Bekman wrote:
> I forgot that SvPV is a macro too, and it turns its len argument into
&len, hence the error. I'm not happy about introducing a temp variable
and copy the values in a tight loop just because of some issue on
netbsd. I'm trying to get hold of Ian Holsman (or anybody else on
Stas Bekman wrote:
Carl Brewer wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
yup, that's strange. Any difference if you drop (STRLEN):
- char *buf = SvPV(*MARK, (STRLEN)wlen);
+ char *buf = SvPV(*MARK, wlen);
Drop the cast, and lo! I have a new mod_perl binary :)
Yeah, but that's not good. Since that patch:
ht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas2004/04/26 13:20:01
Modified:lib/ModPerl Code.pm
Log:
ifdef the definition of the new macros imported from 2.0.49 and not
available in the earlier Apache versions
Revision ChangesPath
1.120 +4 -1 modperl-2.0/lib/ModPerl/Code.pm
Stas Bekman wrote:
gSOAP acct wrote:
Hi Stas,
I think I got the cvs version of modperl you mentioned
...
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/cvspublic
co modperl-2.0
... Is that right?
Right.
> modperl_constants.c:1576: error: `AP_MPMQ_RUNNING'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
I
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
But isn't apxs.bat is a custom script made by Randy? May
be it doesn't include those flags?
That's right - I didn't put anything into EXTRA_CPPFLAGS,
so it just comes back as an empty string. Should this be
considered (by mod_perl) as a
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> >>But isn't apxs.bat is a custom script made by Randy? May
> >>be it doesn't include those flags?
> >
> >
> > That's right - I didn't put anything into EXTRA_CPPFLAGS,
> > so it just comes back as an empty string. Should this be
> > considered (by mod_pe
But isn't apxs.bat is a custom script made by Randy? May
be it doesn't include those flags?
That's right - I didn't put anything into EXTRA_CPPFLAGS,
so it just comes back as an empty string. Should this be
considered (by mod_perl) as an "error"? Or should apxs
put something into EXTRA_CPPFLAGS,
Randy Kobes wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>
>>Steve Hay wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>After realising that everything had apparently gone very quiet on this
>>>list, I discovered for the second time in recent months that I'd been
>>>unsubscribed from it somehow!
>>>
Randy Kobes wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Steve Hay wrote:
>
>
>
>>Randy Kobes wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Randy Kobes wrote:
>Hi,
> One Win32, t/filter/out_str)subreq_default fails
>on Win32 because of
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Steve Hay wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After realising that everything had apparently gone very quiet on this
> > list, I discovered for the second time in recent months that I'd been
> > unsubscribed from it somehow!
>
> it's a qmail feature. If it sends yo
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Steve Hay wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>Randy Kobes wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>One Win32, t/filter/out_str)subreq_default fails
> >>>on Win32 because of different line endings. This:
> >>>===
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Steve Hay wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> >Hi Steve, and all,
> >With great trepidation, I ask ... Steve, with cvs
> >mod_perl 2, and Apache/2.0.49, have you seen any errors
> >connected with having to raise ThreadsPerChild? I find I can
> >run the tests OK with 'nmake tes
CCing to the dev list :)
Beau E. Cox wrote:
> On Monday 26 April 2004 03:43 am, you wrote:
>
>>Beau E. Cox wrote:
>>
>>>Hi -
>>>
>>>It looks like 2.1 is going through a big update tonight,
>>>and the cvs sources are unstable.
>>>
>>>If you have a chance, can you let me know when it is
>>>usable a
Steve Hay wrote:
Hi all,
After realising that everything had apparently gone very quiet on this
list, I discovered for the second time in recent months that I'd been
unsubscribed from it somehow!
it's a qmail feature. If it sends you an email and it bounces. It tries to
send a few probes. If th
Randy Kobes wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Apr 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>
>>Randy Kobes wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>One Win32, t/filter/out_str)subreq_default fails
>>>on Win32 because of different line endings. This:
>>>=
>>>Index: out_str_subreq_d
Randy Kobes wrote:
>Hi Steve, and all,
>With great trepidation, I ask ... Steve, with cvs
>mod_perl 2, and Apache/2.0.49, have you seen any errors
>connected with having to raise ThreadsPerChild? I find I can
>run the tests OK with 'nmake test' (and they start in about
>half the time now!), bu
Hi all,
After realising that everything had apparently gone very quiet on this
list, I discovered for the second time in recent months that I'd been
unsubscribed from it somehow!
I don't know why it keeps happening, but I'm back now anyway. So now
I'm trying to build the latest CVS mp2 to tes
22 matches
Mail list logo
