Hi,
Some of the tests require CGI.pm-3.08; I know Geoffery was working on it
but, it doesn't exist on CPAN, yet.
I'll post the test results as soon as I get LWP installed... doesn't
seem to like 5.9.3 via the CPAN install tries to install 5.8.6.
--
END
--
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
[ttyp1] [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/pgollucci/dev/src/modperl
rv=0 514 >make
cd "src/modules/perl" && make
cc -I/usr/home/pgollucci/dev/src/modperl/src/modules/perl
-I/usr/home/pgollucci/dev/src/modperl/xs -I/usr/local/include/apr-1
-I/usr/local/include/apr-1 -I/usr/local/i
I'm not sure which you want to keep... This removes the bottom one ?
[ttyp1] [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/pgollucci/dev/src/modperl
rv=1 567 >svn diff Changes
Index: Changes
===
--- Changes (revision 160132)
+++ Changes (working co
Hi,
FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT/i386
httpd2(prefork), apr, apr-util, modperl2 all the latest SVN trunks as of
about 1 hour ago.
perl 5.9.3 via rsync no threads
all compiled with debugging symbols/maintermode
I get alll the way to the mp2 compile and get this error which I know
I've seen recently on FSBD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: randyk
Date: Mon Apr 4 20:26:24 2005
New Revision: 160128
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=160128
Log:
update functiontable to reflect recent name changes.
Modified:
perl/modperl/trunk/xs/tables/current/ModPerl/FunctionTable.pm
Modified: perl/mod
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
stas, perrin had also mentioned the idea that since we were moving from
Apache::OK to Apache2::OK (again with a virtual namespace) it might
make
more sense to use Apache::Const::OK instead. I guess that's lots of
typing,
Geoffrey Young wrote:
stas, perrin had also mentioned the idea that since we were moving from
Apache::OK to Apache2::OK (again with a virtual namespace) it might make
more sense to use Apache::Const::OK instead. I guess that's lots of
typing,
but uses always have OK if they want.
thoughts?
Sure,
> I dont' think it matters much, but why not
>
> +my ($man) = $blib =~ m!(?:blib/lib/)(.*)(?:\.pm)!;
because I just can't parse lookaheads (or whatever that is :)
--Geoff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: geoff
Date: Mon Apr 4 12:05:35 2005
New Revision: 160089
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=160089
Log:
add manpages for stuff so that both perldoc and man work
properly
Modified:
perl/modperl/trunk/lib/ModPerl/BuildMM.pm
Modified: perl/modperl/trun
>> stas, perrin had also mentioned the idea that since we were moving from
>> Apache::OK to Apache2::OK (again with a virtual namespace) it might make
>> more sense to use Apache::Const::OK instead. I guess that's lots of
>> typing,
>> but uses always have OK if they want.
>>
>> thoughts?
>
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: geoff
> Date: Mon Apr 4 12:05:35 2005
> New Revision: 160089
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=160089
> Log:
> add manpages for stuff so that both perldoc and man work
> properly
I was essentially trying to make sure that both
$ perldoc A
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
Due to the renaming, methods such as Cserver>
are now called as Cserver>
I think Apache->request/Apache2->request is probably a better example to
use, since it's much more common. or use them both. likewise in the
other
mentio
stas, perrin had also mentioned the idea that since we were moving from
Apache::OK to Apache2::OK (again with a virtual namespace) it might make
more sense to use Apache::Const::OK instead. I guess that's lots of typing,
but uses always have OK if they want.
I like this idea...
-
Stas Bekman wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
> [...]
>
>>> Due to the renaming, methods such as Cserver>
>>> are now called as Cserver>
>>
>>
>>
>> I think Apache->request/Apache2->request is probably a better example to
>> use, since it's much more common. or use them both. likewise in the
>> o
Geoffrey Young wrote:
[...]
Due to the renaming, methods such as Cserver>
are now called as Cserver>
I think Apache->request/Apache2->request is probably a better example to
use, since it's much more common. or use them both. likewise in the other
mention below.
the only reason Apache->request w
> I think I've changed most of the docs now to use Apache2::*,
> rather than Apache::*; of course, there's likely places I
> missed. Also, in particular, the porting docs, and those
> involving Apache2::compat, should be checked, as there it's
> not a straight s/Apache/Apache2/g replace.
nice wor
Further to off line discussions, I wonder if any of the mod perl
folks would be interested in contributing to the opensa project.
I have offered to do some testing however I believe Daniel
would like some help on the dev side. One or two developers
would be enough to get things rolling again.
The p
17 matches
Mail list logo
