Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> > +static MP_INLINE int mpxs_APR__STATUS_is_eagain(pTHX_ apr_status_t rc)
> > +{
> > + return APR_STATUS_IS_EAGAIN(rc) ? TRUE : FALSE;
> > +}
>
> Based on Nicks previous CYGWIN patch...
>
> shouldn't that be MP_STATIC and not static ?
No, it shouldn't
-
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
> > In the discussion of a failure on Win32 of t/error/runtime
> > at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11121785691&r=1&w=2,
> > Stas suggested adding an APR::Status, containing things like
> > APR_STATUS_IS_EAGAIN(s) from apr_errno.h.
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> +static MP_INLINE int mpxs_APR__STATUS_is_eagain(pTHX_ apr_status_t rc)
> +{
> +return APR_STATUS_IS_EAGAIN(rc) ? TRUE : FALSE;
> +}
Based on Nicks previous CYGWIN patch...
shouldn't that be MP_STATIC and not static ?
If it's a macro, it becomes irrelevant :)
--
> +static MP_INLINE int mpxs_APR__STATUS_is_eagain(pTHX_ apr_status_t rc)
> +{
> +return APR_STATUS_IS_EAGAIN(rc) ? TRUE : FALSE;
> +}
Based on Nicks previous CYGWIN patch...
shouldn't that be MP_STATIC and not static ?
--
END
Randy Kobes wrote:
In the discussion of a failure on Win32 of t/error/runtime
at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11121785691&r=1&w=2,
Stas suggested adding an APR::Status, containing things like
APR_STATUS_IS_EAGAIN(s) from apr_errno.h. I've attached a
patch against the current mp2 svn implemen
Randy Kobes wrote:
> In the current mp2 svn, Apache::SizeLimit uses
> Apache2->request
blarg.
> - should that be
> Apache2::RequestUtil->request?
probably :)
--Geoff
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
> - if this problem arises just because an old Apache2.pm is
> still there, and nothing else, perhaps Makefile.PL should
> abort if it finds Apache2.pm? The above error message
> doesn't really suggest what's causing the problem.
that was my original intent, but I guess the Makefile.PL code migra
