mp2biug and httpd TestConfigData

2005-09-12 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Hi All, I've yet to actually see this work without modifications. I posted about this before, and Stas and I agreed my patch was not correct. Moving on Index: lib/ModPerl/Config.pm === --- lib/ModPerl/Config.pm (revision

Re: mod_perl 2.0.2

2005-09-12 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Hi All, Pending the ldd/otool patch to mp2 and A-T, I'd like to see a mp 2.0.2 released as its been almost 4 months and we'll have 17 changes of varying degree. As long as it gets a good spin of positive rc testing under various configs,

Re: PerlChildInitHandler => s/VOID/RUN_ALL/

2005-09-12 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: [...] The only problem I have is how to prevent from Apache to continue on failure. Any ideas? In fact neither a failure in PostConfig prevents from Apache to normall startup: [Mon Sep 12 17:38:21 2005] [error] Can't load Perl file: .../t/conf/post_c

Re: PerlChildInitHandler => s/VOID/RUN_ALL/

2005-09-12 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: [...] The only problem I have is how to prevent from Apache to continue on failure. Any ideas? In fact neither a failure in PostConfig prevents from Apache to normall startup: [Mon Sep 12 17:38:21 2005] [error] Can't load Perl file: .../t/conf/post_config_startup.pl for s

Re: mod_perl 2.0.2

2005-09-12 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Hi All, > > Pending the ldd/otool patch to mp2 and A-T, I'd like to see a mp 2.0.2 > released as > its been almost 4 months and we'll have 17 changes of varying degree. As long as it gets a good spin of positive rc testing under various configs, I am +1 I've got 2-3

Re: mod_perl 2.0.2

2005-09-12 Thread Stas Bekman
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Do we want to include 2.1.7b as "supported" ? At the moment we support only 2.0 officialy. This of course can be always changed... -- __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hac

Re: mod_perl 2.0.2

2005-09-12 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Stas Bekman wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Did you have a chance to run the build/test against all supported perl and Apache versions and several of their different builds? If so and all tests pass, then certainly +1. If not I'll try to run the tests tonight. I'll run them tonight as well.

Re: mod_perl 2.0.2

2005-09-12 Thread Stas Bekman
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Hi All, Pending the ldd/otool patch to mp2 and A-T, I'd like to see a mp 2.0.2 released as its been almost 4 months and we'll have 17 changes of varying degree. I'll volunteer to RM it if I'm allowed. Did you have a chance to run the build/test against all supporte

Re: [PATCH] add ldd/otool output to bug reports

2005-09-12 Thread Randy Kobes
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: If this point was reached, it would break Win32, plus any other system which didn't have an ldd in the PATH. Perhaps Apache::TestConfig::which() could be used to see if an ldd() [or otool()] is present, and skip this part if it's not found? I gues

Re: httpd 2.3.01 and t/modules/proxy.t

2005-09-12 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: What happens is: requested: http://localhost:8536/TestModules__proxy "proxied to": http://localhost:8536/TestModules__proxy_real But if I directly request http://localhost:8536/TestModules__proxy_real Assume 8536 == 8537 .. sorry for the typo -- END

httpd 2.3.01 and t/modules/proxy.t

2005-09-12 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Hi All, t/modules/proxy.t works in 2.0.54, but doesn't in 2.3.01 (aka svn) I'm wondering is this a bug in httpd, or did they just change something we haven't caught up with yet? What happens is: requested: http://localhost:8536/TestModules__proxy "proxied to": http://localhost:8536/TestModules_