Geoffrey Young wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Does this warrant a Changes entry ?
I wouldn' think so
my $mm_ver = $ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION;
+$mm_ver =~ s/_.*//; # handle dev versions like 6.30_01
my $pm_to_blib = ($mm_ver >= 6.22 && $mm_ver <= 6.25)
Could be... Apache2
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Does this warrant a Changes entry ?
I wouldn' think so
>> my $mm_ver = $ExtUtils::MakeMaker::VERSION;
>> +$mm_ver =~ s/_.*//; # handle dev versions like 6.30_01
>> my $pm_to_blib = ($mm_ver >= 6.22 && $mm_ver <= 6.25)
isn't 'no warnings (numeric)' a bi
Does this warrant a Changes entry ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pgollucci
Date: Mon Jan 9 19:54:39 2006
New Revision: 367475
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=367475&view=rev
Log:
fix this Makefile.PL warning
Writing Makefile for X
Argument "6.30_01" isn't numeric in numeric ge (>
Frank Wiles wrote:
Yeah I thought that Apache2:: and ModPerl:: might be reserved for
core as well, but I'm glad I asked.
Ok next question. It's safe to assume that the ModPerl:: space will
be for MP2 and future versions right, since it didn't exist in MP1?
What I have only works wi
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:47:36 -0500
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Wiles wrote:
> > Ok next question. It's safe to assume that the ModPerl:: space
> > will be for MP2 and future versions right, since it didn't exist in
> > MP1? What I have only works with MP2 and I don't want
Frank Wiles wrote:
Ok next question. It's safe to assume that the ModPerl:: space will
be for MP2 and future versions right, since it didn't exist in MP1?
What I have only works with MP2 and I don't want to put it in a space
where people will assume it will work with both.
There are n
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:29:49 -0800
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> > Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >> Probably ModPerl:: is the best fit, IMHO :) Though you may have
> >> more popularity with /Apache/ in case people aren't aware about
> >> the existance of the ModP
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Probably ModPerl:: is the best fit, IMHO :) Though you may have more
popularity with /Apache/ in case people aren't aware about the
existance of the ModPerl:: namespace.
Was I mistakenly under the impression that Modperl:: was reserved for
modper
Stas Bekman wrote:
Probably ModPerl:: is the best fit, IMHO :) Though you may have more
popularity with /Apache/ in case people aren't aware about the existance
of the ModPerl:: namespace.
Was I mistakenly under the impression that Modperl:: was reserved for
modperl core ?
I would have said A
Frank Wiles wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I'm a BIG fan of using custom Apache directives in MP2 and because
of this I've written a wrapper into my personal libs that makes using
them a bit easier than the strict API calls. It isn't very fancy, but
helps make the simple things simple.
It
Hi Everyone,
I'm a BIG fan of using custom Apache directives in MP2 and because
of this I've written a wrapper into my personal libs that makes using
them a bit easier than the strict API calls. It isn't very fancy, but
helps make the simple things simple.
It's not quite ready t
Stas, I'm 99% sure this is a FreeBSD specific problem. I can not
duplicate this on Fedora Core 2/3
rm -rf /usr/home/pgollucci/dev/src/perl-bleed
rsync -acvz --delete --force
rsync://public.activestate.com/perl-current/
/usr/home/pgollucci/dev/src/perl-bleed
/usr/home/pgollucci/dev/src/perl-b
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi all,
As I've reviving this thread, let me link to it:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/83393
I'll start by saying across at least 20 FreeBSD computers and a mirriad
of versions and configs between 5.0 and 7.0-current, I've never seen
this work sin
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
As a more generic solution, this might make sense. On first glance,
your patch
looks sane, but I won't have the time to really look at it until Jan
15th, so
if anybody else feels like writing a few tests for this and beat me to
it...
Would
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Geoff,
>
> http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/modperl/2871864
>
> I never saw this get committed .. ?
>
> What needs to happen for that ?
I think I was waiting for him to get back to me with some real test results,
which IIRC he said he would do
Geoff,
http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/modperl/2871864
I never saw this get committed .. ?
What needs to happen for that ?
--
"Love is not the one you can picture yourself marrying,
but the one you c
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>> As a more generic solution, this might make sense. On first glance,
>> your patch
>> looks sane, but I won't have the time to really look at it until Jan
>> 15th, so
>> if anybody else feels like writing a few tests for this and beat me to
>> it...
>
> Wouldn't that be
17 matches
Mail list logo
