On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Fred Moyer wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
In preparing for creating a branch for Torsten's threading work, I looked
at our BRANCHING document, and it's associated script build/svn.remerge.
Instead, I'd like to push forward a great svn merge tool, svnmerge[1]
+1
+1
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> On Thursday 11 October 2007 15:18, Torsten Foertsch wrote:
>> if (key) {
>> STRLEN len;
>> char *k = SvPV(key, len);
>>
>> if (val) {
>> retval = *hv_store(*pnotes, k, len, SvREFCNT_inc(val), 0);
>> }
>> else if (hv
On Thursday 11 October 2007 15:18, Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> if (key) {
> STRLEN len;
> char *k = SvPV(key, len);
>
> if (val) {
> retval = *hv_store(*pnotes, k, len, SvREFCNT_inc(val), 0);
> }
> else if (hv_exists(*pnotes, k, len)) {
>
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a snippet from modperl_util.c:modperl_pnotes()
>
> if (key) {
> STRLEN len;
> char *k = SvPV(key, len);
>
> if (val) {
> retval = *hv_store(*pnotes, k, len, SvREFCNT_inc(val), 0);
> }
> else if (h
Hi,
this is a snippet from modperl_util.c:modperl_pnotes()
if (key) {
STRLEN len;
char *k = SvPV(key, len);
if (val) {
retval = *hv_store(*pnotes, k, len, SvREFCNT_inc(val), 0);
}
else if (hv_exists(*pnotes, k, len)) {
retval =
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 21:20, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> The only question I have is wherever it's necessary to also expose the
> following 2 items:
>
> modperl_interp_pool_t * | IV
> PerlInterpreter * | IV
>
> Especially in the current patch, what you get out will pretty much
> be a
