Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> On Thursday 11 October 2007 15:18, Torsten Foertsch wrote:
>> I am wondering whether the REFCNT is always right. *pnotes is a HV. If the
>> function is called without a key argument the else branch newRV_inc
>> increments the REFCNT of the HV, right? Then the return statem
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 October 2007 21:20, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>> The only question I have is wherever it's necessary to also expose the
>> following 2 items:
>>
>> modperl_interp_pool_t * | IV
>> PerlInterpreter * | IV
>>
>> Especially in the current patch, what yo
On Thursday 11 October 2007 15:18, Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> I am wondering whether the REFCNT is always right. *pnotes is a HV. If the
> function is called without a key argument the else branch newRV_inc
> increments the REFCNT of the HV, right? Then the return statement in the
> last line increm