On Monday 22 October 2007, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> And make modperl_trace always prefix log messages with modperl_tid_pid()?
That makes sense. I didn't know about modperl_pid_tid(). But the
implementation is not good.
1) It requires a pool that is not always available
2) It introduces a me
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
> On Thursday 18 October 2007, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
>> Any chance you can break the patch into multiple patches
>
> This one adds the current pid to the output of modperl_trace.
Wouldn't a better all-around approach use a pid/tid combination for
threaded MPMs and fa
