[my webmail client didn't cc [email protected] so including original
response here.
But if you are reading this you should fast forward to RC5.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/dev/96421
Else here is the original response.]
__DATA__
___
> Sat Feb 16 11:11:48 2008: Request 33303 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PROBLEM:
> If I turn off USE_SMAPS (i.e. set Apache::SizeLimit::USE_SMAPS=0), I get
> an
> error, specifically:
I just tested this out on my Centos 5.0 platform and it looks like
Apache::
>>> Fred Moyer wrote:
> Here's the problem, the first line in t/conf/extra.last.conf.in is
>
>
>
> And here is the unix vx linux relevant apache_test_config.pm section [1].
> Notice how Win32 doesn't have mod_perl.c, hence the IfModule is false, and
> the location directives are not set.
And now
>> http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Reload-0.10-RC5.tar.gz
>>
>> - all tests skipped successfully in environment without mod_perl.c on
>> Linux 2.6, perl 5.8.8
>> - all tests pass on mp1, perl 5.8.8, darwin 10.5.2
>> - all tests pass on mp2, perl 5.8.8, darwin 10.5.2
>> - all tests pass on mp
Original Message
Subject: [rt.cpan.org #33303] Bug in Apache::SizeLimit
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:11:50 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sat
On Feb 16, 2008 2:00 PM, Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For reasons of compatibility, would
> it be better to just supply an Apache::request()
> that calls Apache2::compat::request()?
That sounds reasonable. I have a couple of tests for this too,
contributed by Jim Brandt.
- Perrin
--
Hi,
As discussed at
http://marc.info/?t=12029120025&r=1&w=2
and pointed out by Perrin:
http://marc.info/?l=apache-modperl&m=120301930604550&w=2
Apache2::compat doesn't provide the request method in
the Apache namespace (it's currently defined in the
Apache2::compat package). Thus, Apa
> Fred Moyer wrote:
>>> Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: gozer
> Date: Sun Feb 3 01:10:04 2008
> New Revision: 617965
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=617965&view=rev
> Log:
> Apache::Reload isn't part o
> http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-Reload-0.10-RC5.tar.gz
>
> - all tests skipped successfully in environment without mod_perl.c on
> Linux 2.6, perl 5.8.8
> - all tests pass on mp1, perl 5.8.8, darwin 10.5.2
> - all tests pass on mp2, perl 5.8.8, darwin 10.5.2
> - all tests pass on mp2, perl
