Volker Kroll wrote:
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 10:02, Stas Bekman wrote:
Perfect. Finally the detection is properly working. Now the test suite doesn't
even start, since we can tell ahead that it won't work.
The next stage will be to find a workaround for the problem.
Thanks a lot for the testing,
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 10:02, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Perfect. Finally the detection is properly working. Now the test suite doesn't
> even start, since we can tell ahead that it won't work.
>
> The next stage will be to find a workaround for the problem.
>
> Thanks a lot for the testing, Volker.
Volker Kroll wrote:
Good Morning Stas.
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 21:33, Stas Bekman wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
I think I've figured it out. Can you please try with the current cvs or just
apply this patch:
This is the result after updating from CVS:
/usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib \
t/TEST -
Good Morning Stas.
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 21:33, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Stas Bekman wrote:
> I think I've figured it out. Can you please try with the current cvs or just
> apply this patch:
>
This is the result after updating from CVS:
/usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib \
t/TEST -clean
*** set
Stas Bekman wrote:
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 19:24, Stas Bekman wrote:
Volker Kroll wrote:
[...]
drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 4096 Dec 15 09:55 /root/modperl-2.0
drwxr-x--- 21 root root 4096 Dec 16 11:06 /root
and what are the perms of /root/modperl-2.0/t?
drwxr-xr-x
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 19:24, Stas Bekman wrote:
Volker Kroll wrote:
[...]
drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 4096 Dec 15 09:55 /root/modperl-2.0
drwxr-x--- 21 root root 4096 Dec 16 11:06 /root
and what are the perms of /root/modperl-2.0/t?
drwxr-xr-x 21 nobody nobody
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 19:24, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Volker Kroll wrote:
> [...]
> > drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 4096 Dec 15 09:55 /root/modperl-2.0
> > drwxr-x--- 21 root root 4096 Dec 16 11:06 /root
>
> and what are the perms of /root/modperl-2.0/t?
drwxr-xr-x 21 nobody nobody 4
Volker Kroll wrote:
[...]
drwxr-xr-x 19 root root 4096 Dec 15 09:55 /root/modperl-2.0
drwxr-x--- 21 root root 4096 Dec 16 11:06 /root
and what are the perms of /root/modperl-2.0/t?
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH --
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 19:01, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [Volker, please keep the followups on the list. Thanks.]
oops sorry.
> rm t/logs/error_log
> t/TEST -v apache/add_config
>
END in modperl_extra.pl, pid=20136
[Tue Dec 16 18:54:46 2003] [notice] Apache/2.0.48 (Unix)
mod_perl/1.99_12-dev Perl/v5.8
[Volker, please keep the followups on the list. Thanks.]
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 18:40, Stas Bekman wrote:
Volker Kroll wrote:
/usr/bin/perl -Mlib=/root/modperl-2.0/Apache-Test/lib -MApache::TestRun \
-e 'Apache::TestRun::run_root_fs_test(99, 99, q[/root/modperl-2.0/t])';
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 20:44, Stas Bekman wrote:
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 10:29, Stas Bekman wrote:
no, no, it has nothing to do with the error_log, Can I see what you get when
running:
/usr/bin/perl -Mlib=/root/modperl-2.0/Apache-Test/lib -MApache::TestRu
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 20:44, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Volker Kroll wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 10:29, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>no, no, it has nothing to do with the error_log, Can I see what you get when
> >>running:
> >>
> >>/usr/bin/perl -Mlib=/root/modperl-2.0/Apache-Test/lib -MApache:
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 10:29, Stas Bekman wrote:
no, no, it has nothing to do with the error_log, Can I see what you get when
running:
/usr/bin/perl -Mlib=/root/modperl-2.0/Apache-Test/lib -MApache::TestRun \
-e 'eval {Apache::TestRun::run_root_fs_test(99, 99, q[/root/modperl
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 10:29, Stas Bekman wrote:
> no, no, it has nothing to do with the error_log, Can I see what you get when
> running:
>
> /usr/bin/perl -Mlib=/root/modperl-2.0/Apache-Test/lib -MApache::TestRun \
> -e 'eval {Apache::TestRun::run_root_fs_test(99, 99, q[/root/modperl-2.0/t])}';
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Sun, 2003-12-14 at 03:18, Stas Bekman wrote:
Great. I have now integrated this test into Apache-Test. Can you please verify
that modperl-2.0's 'make test' refuses to run when modperl-2.0 is checked out
under /root? Please use the latest cvs version:
http://perl.apache.org
On Sun, 2003-12-14 at 03:18, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Great. I have now integrated this test into Apache-Test. Can you please verify
> that modperl-2.0's 'make test' refuses to run when modperl-2.0 is checked out
> under /root? Please use the latest cvs version:
> http://perl.apache.org/download/sou
Volker Kroll wrote:
[...]
Hmm, does not work for me, I modified it slightly:
use File::Spec::Functions qw(catfile);
my($uid, $gid) = (getpwnam(qq[nobody]))[2..3];
$( = $) = $gid+0;
die qq[failed to change gid to $gid] if $( != $gid;
$< = $> = $uid+0;
die qq[failed to change uid to $uid] if $< != $
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 15:36, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Volker Kroll wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 00:32, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>Can you please try this one:
> >>
> >> % perl -le ' \
> >>my($uid, $gid) = (getpwnam("nobody"))[2..3]; \
> >>$( = $) = $gid+0; \
> >>die "failed to change
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 00:32, Stas Bekman wrote:
Can you please try this one:
% perl -le ' \
my($uid, $gid) = (getpwnam("nobody"))[2..3]; \
$( = $) = $gid+0; \
die "failed to change gid to $gid (now: $(, $))" if $( != $gid; \
$< = $> = $uid+0; \
die "failed to c
On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 00:32, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Can you please try this one:
>
> % perl -le ' \
> my($uid, $gid) = (getpwnam("nobody"))[2..3]; \
> $( = $) = $gid+0; \
> die "failed to change gid to $gid (now: $(, $))" if $( != $gid; \
> $< = $> = $uid+0; \
> die "failed to
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 18:57, Stas Bekman wrote:
Which probably means that your perl POSIX implementation is broken.
Wed Dec 10 12:15:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> su -
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# perl -le 'require POSIX; POSIX::setgid(99) or die
"failed to run: $@";'
[EMAI
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 18:57, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Which probably means that your perl POSIX implementation is broken.
Wed Dec 10 12:15:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> su -
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# perl -le 'require POSIX; POSIX::setgid(99) or die
"failed to run: $@";'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 18:25, Stas Bekman wrote:
% su - nobody
This account is currently not available.
So I think, here is the problem:
grep ^nobody /etc/passwd
nobody:x:99:99:Nobody:/:/sbin/nologin
nobody cannot login and allocate a shell
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 18:25, Stas Bekman wrote:
> % su - nobody
This account is currently not available.
So I think, here is the problem:
grep ^nobody /etc/passwd
nobody:x:99:99:Nobody:/:/sbin/nologin
nobody cannot login and allocate a shell
> The 'su - nobo
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:09, Stas Bekman wrote:
[Volker has sent me the long output offline, so I'm just quoting the
interesting parts here]
I also want to see the console messages (not error_log) when you run
from under /root/mod_perl-1.99_11/ as you did it in first place.
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 00:09, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [Volker has sent me the long output offline, so I'm just quoting the
> interesting parts here]
>
> >> I also want to see the console messages (not error_log) when you run
> >> from under /root/mod_perl-1.99_11/ as you did it in first place.
>
>
[Volker has sent me the long output offline, so I'm just quoting the
interesting parts here]
I also want to see the console messages (not error_log) when you run
from under /root/mod_perl-1.99_11/ as you did it in first place.
> ulimit -c unlimited; t/TEST -bugreport -verbose=0
> *** root mode:
Volker Kroll wrote:
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 02:16, Stas Bekman wrote:
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
mod_perl compiles fine but all tests seem to fail.
in the error log I do find:
**03 14:42:34 2003] [error] failed to resolve handler `T
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 02:16, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > -8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
> > 1. Problem Description:
> >
> > mod_perl compiles fine but all tests seem to fail.
> >
> > in the error log I do find:
> >
> > **03 14:42:34 2003] [error] failed to resolv
Volker Kroll wrote:
Havn't seen the mail go through, so I resend it.
Regards
Volker
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
mod_perl compiles fine but all tests seem to fail.
in the error log I do find:
**03 14:42:34 2003] [error] failed to res
30 matches
Mail list logo
