On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Torsten Förtsch
wrote:
> On 24/06/13 19:36, Jan Kaluza wrote:
>> I think the separate "xs24" directory is easier to implement definitely.
>> Maybe it doesn't have to be whole xs directory, but just xs/maps and
>> xs/tables subdirectries. Someone would have to check
- Original Message -
> On 24/06/13 19:36, Jan Kaluza wrote:
> > I think the separate "xs24" directory is easier to implement definitely.
> > Maybe it doesn't have to be whole xs directory, but just xs/maps and
> > xs/tables subdirectries. Someone would have to check that :).
>
> I think I
On 24/06/13 19:36, Jan Kaluza wrote:
> I think the separate "xs24" directory is easier to implement definitely.
> Maybe it doesn't have to be whole xs directory, but just xs/maps and
> xs/tables subdirectries. Someone would have to check that :).
I think I don't like the idea of having separate di
On 24/06/13 19:36, Jan Kaluza wrote:
> Since there can't be conditionals in those files currently, it's impossible
> to have the same xs/* files for both httpd versions. The solution for this
> could be another "xs24" directory with httpd-2.4 xs files, or improving all
> the generators in lib/ModPe
- Original Message -
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:18:24AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote:
>
> >> I think what we are lacking here right now is some sort of decision what
> >> to do next. I can't decide which way should the development go, I d
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:18:24AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote:
>> I think what we are lacking here right now is some sort of decision what
>> to do next. I can't decide which way should the development go, I don't
>> have permissions (politically,
On 06/23/2013 10:52 PM, Niko Tyni wrote:
At the moment httpd24 is lagging behind trunk. There seems to be a need
for making sure they stay synchronised.
This is temporary state and it was supposed to be like that only before
someone from core mod_perl developers decides how to continue with the
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 05:18:24AM -0400, Jan Kaluza wrote:
> I'm more than happy to apply patches to the httpd24 branch if you don't have
> commit access there. I will try to re-merge current trunk with httpd24 branch
> soon - today or on Monday (I have done that some months ago for last time).
- Original Message -
> Fred Moyer :
>
> > > What else? Time for 2.4 httpd?
>
> Debian is also moving to Apache 2.4 and we've been working on getting
> mod_perl2 to cope. We're currently using the httpd24 branch as a base
> (thanks for your work, Jan!), merged with the 2.0.8 release. We fo
Fred Moyer :
> > What else? Time for 2.4 httpd?
Debian is also moving to Apache 2.4 and we've been working on getting
mod_perl2 to cope. We're currently using the httpd24 branch as a base
(thanks for your work, Jan!), merged with the 2.0.8 release. We found
a few issues that I intend to post as s
- Original Message -
> We're good to go for 2.0.9-dev commits.
>
> I'm going to restore being able to run the tests (instead of skipping) as
> root user. I can't remember what the issue was before, but it looks like
> most cpan testers are root user.
>
> What else? Time for 2.4 httpd?
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
