Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
[...]
Philippe, where are you with this $bb->cleanup issue?
Well, things are indeed strange. I've just updated httpd an hour ago and I
can still reproduce the problem here, on my work machine. At home, on my
other almost identical linux box (both Fedora Core 2), I can't
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[ ... ]
there's a block of tests in TestAPR/pool.pm
that are commented out. I just tried these, and now they
all pass for me! So I guess we can re-enable them?
Can you check your original report and see whether you no
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
[ ... ]
> > there's a block of tests in TestAPR/pool.pm
> > that are commented out. I just tried these, and now they
> > all pass for me! So I guess we can re-enable them?
>
> Can you check your original report and see whether you no
Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I still have it crashing ...
Please try the following 3 variations (the first one should certainly
work as it doesn't call cleanup).
Unfortunately, only the 1st one works for me ... The 2nd one
cras
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I still have it crashing ...
Please try the following 3 variations (the first one should certainly
work as it doesn't call cleanup).
Unfortunately, only the 1st one works for me ... The 2nd one
crashes after completing
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> > I still have it crashing ...
>
> Please try the following 3 variations (the first one should certainly
> work as it doesn't call cleanup).
Unfortunately, only the 1st one works for me ... The 2nd one
crashes after completing two t
Randy Kobes wrote:
I still have it crashing ...
Please try the following 3 variations (the first one should certainly
work as it doesn't call cleanup).
BTW, didn't we also have a problem with ARP::Pool::cleanup on win32? I
remember disabling those tests, as I couldn't reproduce it on my
machin
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Steve Hay wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
[ .. ]
> >I compiled my perl too, although using the sources
> >ActiveState provides (for build 810, based on 5.8.4).
> >
> Are you distributing your Perl build in any way?
>
> If you are, then I think you have to hack around the
> ActiveP
Randy Kobes wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Steve Hay wrote:
>
>
>
>>Randy Kobes wrote:
>>
>>
>[ .. ]
>
>
>>>Steve, is your Perl similar to mine?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Certainly is (although I built mine myself, rather than using
>>ActivePerl), so perhaps 2.0.50 is what makes the difference? I
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Steve Hay wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
[ .. ]
> >Steve, is your Perl similar to mine?
> >
> Certainly is (although I built mine myself, rather than using
> ActivePerl), so perhaps 2.0.50 is what makes the difference? I'll see
> if I can find time to try it soon.
I compiled my
Randy Kobes wrote:
>On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>
>>>No, no change - I still get it crashing (perl-5.8.4,
>>>Apache/2.0.50, Win32).
>>>
>>>
>>Thanks for testing, Randy and Steve. How about this patch:
>>
>>
>I still have it crashing ... This is with Apache/2.0.50 -
>Ste
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > No, no change - I still get it crashing (perl-5.8.4,
> > Apache/2.0.50, Win32).
>
> Thanks for testing, Randy and Steve. How about this patch:
>
> Index: t/protocol/TestProtocol/echo_bbs2.pm
> =
Stas Bekman wrote:
>>No, no change - I still get it crashing (perl-5.8.4,
>>Apache/2.0.50, Win32).
>>
>>
>
>Thanks for testing, Randy and Steve. How about this patch:
>
Works fine for me -- all tests OK (main testsuite and MP-R testsuite),
but I never saw any failure with this test anyway ;)
No, no change - I still get it crashing (perl-5.8.4,
Apache/2.0.50, Win32).
Thanks for testing, Randy and Steve. How about this patch:
Index: t/protocol/TestProtocol/echo_bbs2.pm
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/t/protocol/TestProto
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Steve Hay wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >
> >>I now have all tests successful in the main test suite and
> >>ModPerl-Registry's.
> >
> > Hi Steve,
> > That's great! Does this mean also that the
> > protocol/echo_bbs2 te
Randy Kobes wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Steve Hay wrote:
>[ ... ]
>
>
>>I now have all tests successful in the main test suite and
>>ModPerl-Registry's.
>>
>>
>Hi Steve,
>That's great! Does this mean also that the
>protocol/echo_bbs2 test passes for you? A few days
>ago it was crashing o
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
[ ... ]
That's great! Does this mean also that the
protocol/echo_bbs2 test passes for you? A few days
ago it was crashing on me, but I haven't tested that
particular test yet with the current cvs.
Nothing has changed s
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Randy Kobes wrote:
[ ... ]
> > That's great! Does this mean also that the
> > protocol/echo_bbs2 test passes for you? A few days
> > ago it was crashing on me, but I haven't tested that
> > particular test yet with the current cvs.
>
> Nothing has chang
Randy Kobes wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Steve Hay wrote:
[ ... ]
I now have all tests successful in the main test suite and
ModPerl-Registry's.
Hi Steve,
That's great! Does this mean also that the
protocol/echo_bbs2 test passes for you? A few days
ago it was crashing on me, but I haven't tested
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Steve Hay wrote:
[ ... ]
> I now have all tests successful in the main test suite and
> ModPerl-Registry's.
Hi Steve,
That's great! Does this mean also that the
protocol/echo_bbs2 test passes for you? A few days
ago it was crashing on me, but I haven't tested that
particular
Stas Bekman wrote:
>Steve Hay wrote:
>
>
>>All is not quite well with the current CVS mp2 tests -- the
>>ModPerl-Registry tests fail from t/basic.t onwards.
>>
>>It seems that this test is now crashing Apache.exe. It can be
>>reproduced in isolation. Here's a stack trace:
>>
>>
>[...]
>
Steve Hay wrote:
All is not quite well with the current CVS mp2 tests -- the
ModPerl-Registry tests fail from t/basic.t onwards.
It seems that this test is now crashing Apache.exe. It can be
reproduced in isolation. Here's a stack trace:
[...]
It crashed right at the start of Perl_sv_unmagic()
22 matches
Mail list logo
