[Resending from an address that's actually subscribed to the lists...]
The current mod_perl release (2.0.10) is taken from trunk. (The
httpd24 branch was only for development work leading towards the
previous release (2.0.9), and is now obsolete.)
On 17 November 2016 at 09:03, Issac Goldstand wr
...@httpd.apache.org
Cc: apreq-...@httpd.apache.org; dev@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: apreq release
Yes, if we go through with this. The mod_apreq2 stuff is in httpd.
However I just realized that although it's been in trunk for years now, it's
never been backported to the 2.4.x branch. I&
That was my knee-jerk reaction, too, but after digging, I saw that win32
really shouldn't be affected.
On 11/16/2016 4:09 PM, Steve Hay wrote:
> On 15 November 2016 at 09:26, Issac Goldstand wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't compatible with
>> Apache
Yes, if we go through with this. The mod_apreq2 stuff is in httpd.
However I just realized that although it's been in trunk for years now,
it's never been backported to the 2.4.x branch. I'm not sure why, and
my google-fu isn't finding relevant discussion on dev@httpd.
When I initially took a lo
On 15 November 2016 at 09:26, Issac Goldstand wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't compatible with
> Apache 2.4 and requested a change. Given that we haven't released an
> updated apreq in nearly 6 years, I'm inclined to make/test the changes
> to the test
Given that the C was (finally) merged into httpd years ago, and given
that there are no proposed code changes, I'd say that's not such a bad
idea...
I've become a bit rusty in Perl (and even with apreq) over the years,
but IIRC, all of the Perl glue is in
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/apre
Honestly, I've no clue. The plan is just to add a few checks with
mod_version (if available) to deal with the 2.2/2.4 config syntax
changes, and the changes so far seem to only be in the test suite. I
haven't hit any changes in libapreq itself yet.
I don't have any connection with the Debian mai
Good news!! No idea why apreq hasn't just been merged into mod_perl after
all these years.
A+++
On Nov 15, 2016 3:27 AM, "Issac Goldstand" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Someone (finally) noticed that apreq's test suite isn't compatible with
> Apache 2.4 and requested a change. Given that we haven't rele
