Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_block.pm echo_timeout.pm

2004-06-10 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Geoffrey Young wrote: e.g.: % cvs co -D 20040601 -d mp2-20040601 modperl-2.0 yeah, I can try when I get the time (heh). but it might not be mod_perl's fault so I'll really need to do an httpd regression as well. OK. Either way it's better to get the bugs

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_block.pm echo_timeout.pm

2004-06-10 Thread Geoffrey Young
Stas Bekman wrote: > Geoffrey Young wrote: > >>> e.g.: >>> % cvs co -D 20040601 -d mp2-20040601 modperl-2.0 >> >> >> >> yeah, I can try when I get the time (heh). but it might not be mod_perl's >> fault so I'll really need to do an httpd regression as well. > > > OK. Either way it's better to

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_block.pm echo_timeout.pm

2004-06-08 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: e.g.: % cvs co -D 20040601 -d mp2-20040601 modperl-2.0 yeah, I can try when I get the time (heh). but it might not be mod_perl's fault so I'll really need to do an httpd regression as well. OK. Either way it's better to get the bugs fixed while they are hot :) --

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_block.pm echo_timeout.pm

2004-06-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
> e.g.: > % cvs co -D 20040601 -d mp2-20040601 modperl-2.0 yeah, I can try when I get the time (heh). but it might not be mod_perl's fault so I'll really need to do an httpd regression as well. --Geoff - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_block.pm echo_timeout.pm

2004-06-08 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: Are you sure this is because of this last change? I haven't really changed much. If you revert it, does it work ok? no, it wasn't due to the last change in echo_timeout.pm - I was just searching for the most recent change to respond to :) but it is something fairly recent - m

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_block.pm echo_timeout.pm

2004-06-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
> Are you sure this is because of this last change? I haven't really > changed much. If you revert it, does it work ok? no, it wasn't due to the last change in echo_timeout.pm - I was just searching for the most recent change to respond to :) but it is something fairly recent - my nightly builds

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_block.pm echo_timeout.pm

2004-06-08 Thread Stas Bekman
Geoffrey Young wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stas2004/06/03 01:22:21 Modified:t/filter/TestFilter both_str_con_add.pm t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_block.pm echo_timeout.pm Log: - apparently setting to a blocking IO is not going to be a workaround but a requirement, s

Re: cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_block.pm echo_timeout.pm

2004-06-07 Thread Geoffrey Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > stas2004/06/03 01:22:21 > > Modified:t/filter/TestFilter both_str_con_add.pm >t/protocol/TestProtocol echo_block.pm echo_timeout.pm > Log: > - apparently setting to a blocking IO is not going to be a workaround but > a requirement, s