On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> The good thing about lib.pm is that it removes duplicates if any.
sure. the bad thing is it is much more expensive and bloated. all the
stats and 'use Config'.
> I've changed the docs to say:
>
> As an alternative to using C in I to adjust
> C<@INC
Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>
>>Should the same change be applied for -Mblib, which you have used for
>>demonstrating different @INC in two vhosts? I know it's not same as
>>-Mlib=, the question is whether -Mblib works on darwin/5.6.0
>
>
> nope, seems
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Should the same change be applied for -Mblib, which you have used for
> demonstrating different @INC in two vhosts? I know it's not same as
> -Mlib=, the question is whether -Mblib works on darwin/5.6.0
nope, seems it was only the case i changed caused
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dougm 02/05/30 16:57:50
>
> Modified:t/response/TestDirective perlmodule.pm perlrequire.pm
> Log:
> -Mlib= is broken on darwin/5.6.0, change to -I which works everywhere
Should the same change be applied for -Mblib, which you have used for
demonstratin
