Geoffrey Young wrote:
Apache::LOG_MARK() is now Apache::Log::LOG_MARK()
So it shouldn't be called LOG_MARK, it's an ugly duplication: Log::LOG
How about Apache::Log::MARK?
I thought about that, but we currently use Apache::Log::LOG_ERR,
Apache::Log::LOG_DEBUG, etc for the constants, so I figu
>> Apache::LOG_MARK() is now Apache::Log::LOG_MARK()
>
>
> So it shouldn't be called LOG_MARK, it's an ugly duplication: Log::LOG
>
> How about Apache::Log::MARK?
I thought about that, but we currently use Apache::Log::LOG_ERR,
Apache::Log::LOG_DEBUG, etc for the constants, so I figured to k
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
geoff 2004/01/19 08:25:54
Modified:t/response/TestAPI aplog.pm
xs/Apache/Log Apache__Log.h
xs/maps modperl_functions.map
Log:
Apache::LOG_MARK() is now Apache::Log::LOG_MARK()
So it shouldn't be called LOG_MARK, it's an ugly d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stas2003/02/17 01:03:17
Modified:.Changes
lib/Apache compat.pm
src/modules/perl modperl_callback.c modperl_callback.h
modperl_handler.c
t/htdocs .cvsignore
t/modperl
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> damn, the emails are coming with such a huge delay :( Since you already
> exercise Apache->server here, should I remove the tests I've added just now?
keep em in there, more tests the better, as always.
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dougm 01/10/09 11:01:21
>
> Modified:t/conf modperl_extra.pl
>xs/Apache/ServerUtil Apache__ServerUtil.h
>xs/maps modperl_functions.map
> Log:
> add Apache->server method
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.9
