Re: mod_perl 2.0.6

2011-02-19 Thread Fred Moyer
2011/2/17 Torsten Förtsch : > However, my highest priority is merging the threading branch. It works on > Linux with a threaded and non-threaded perls. Testing and perhaps fixing on > Windows needs to be done. I have managed to compile and test perl on a XP VM. > That's a 1st step. But I won't mind

Re: mod_perl 2.0.6

2011-02-19 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 2/17/2011 5:16 AM, Torsten Förtsch wrote: > Do you have a link? > > However, my highest priority is merging the threading branch. It works on > Linux with a threaded and non-threaded perls. Testing and perhaps fixing on > Windows needs to be done. I have managed to compile and test perl on a

Re: mod_perl 2.0.6

2011-02-19 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
A bit aggressive, but I like it. More releases will definitely lead to more code-wise contributors. On 2/16/2011 9:28 PM, Fred Moyer wrote: > I'm going to roll a 2.0.6 RC in the last week of April in two months. > That should put us on track for quarterly releases. > > In the meantime, if you

Re: mod_perl 2.0.6

2011-02-17 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote: > It's only a guess, and I don't care enough to go through the code for > evidence. I think people generally underestimate the complexity of > HTTP and the difficulty of writing a bug-free network server based on > it. Apache HTTPD is the resul

Re: mod_perl 2.0.6

2011-02-17 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:42 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > That's an assertion in need of evidence. It's only a guess, and I don't care enough to go through the code for evidence. I think people generally underestimate the complexity of HTTP and the difficulty of writing a bug-free network serv

Re: mod_perl 2.0.6

2011-02-17 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Feb 17, 2011, at 7:15 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote: >> Another nit I have to pick (Torsten maybe this would be up your alley) >> is that @miyagawa posted a benchmark a while ago showing that his >> Starman pure perl server was slightly faster than mod_perl. > > No offense to Miyagawa, but this is

Re: mod_perl 2.0.6

2011-02-17 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Fred Moyer wrote: > Another nit I have to pick (Torsten maybe this would be up your alley) > is that @miyagawa posted a benchmark a while ago showing that his > Starman pure perl server was slightly faster than mod_perl. No offense to Miyagawa, but this is probabl

Re: mod_perl 2.0.6

2011-02-17 Thread Torsten Förtsch
On Thursday, February 17, 2011 03:28:47 Fred Moyer wrote: > I'm going to roll a 2.0.6 RC in the last week of April in two months. > That should put us on track for quarterly releases. but, no pressure, ;-) I like that. > In the meantime, if you have tuits, there are 19 bugs in the RT queue: > >