On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> I assume that if Apache is built with LFS, we do need them (though I
> think apxs will take care of that). What about if perl is - can we
> really get away without not using LFS when perl is?
we can get away with it because Perl never passes lfs
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> the 5.6.0+ uselargefile flags: -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> are still the source of many core dump reports. i just committed a patch
> to rip them out by default. mod_perl does not need them. but they can be
> turned back on with Ma
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 06:11:51PM -0800, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> the 5.6.0+ uselargefile flags: -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> are still the source of many core dump reports. i just committed a patch
> to rip them out by default. mod_perl does not need them. but they can be
> tu
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 06:11:51PM -0800, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> the 5.6.0+ uselargefile flags: -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> are still the source of many core dump reports. i just committed a patch
> to rip them out by default. mod_perl does not need them. but they can be
> tu
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> the 5.6.0+ uselargefile flags: -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
> are still the source of many core dump reports. i just committed a patch
> to rip them out by default. mod_perl does not need them. but they can be
> turned back on with Ma
