Re: mod_perl 2.0 and mod_dav

2001-05-24 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Gerald Richter wrote: > At the moment there are differences, but they aren't so great, but Greg is > about to change the some of the interfaces in 2.0. > > My first step would be to implement a version of 1.x (but keep 2.0) in mind > (Because I need it now in a production e

Re: mod_perl 2.0 and mod_dav

2001-05-24 Thread Gerald Richter
Hi Doug, > > if you implement an interface to mod_dav that works with both 1.x and 2.x, > that would be great and then we can skip the inclusion of an interface > bundled with modperl-2.0. or we could have two, your 1.x version on cpan, > and a 2.x version bundled with modperl-2.0. i'm not sur

Re: mod_perl 2.0 and mod_dav

2001-05-24 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Gerald Richter wrote: > Hi Doug, > > do you have any plans for supporting mod_dav (which is now part of Apache > 2.0) in mod_perl 2.0 ? yes, i would like to have an auto-generated interface for 2.0, but have not looked at mod_dav yet. > The reason for my question is, that

mod_perl 2.0 and mod_dav

2001-05-24 Thread Gerald Richter
Hi Doug, do you have any plans for supporting mod_dav (which is now part of Apache 2.0) in mod_perl 2.0 ? The reason for my question is, that I am about to start to write a Perl interface to mod_dav, so you can create a custom repository (which let you store data and properties, or manage ACL or