On Fri, 25 May 2001, Gerald Richter wrote:
> At the moment there are differences, but they aren't so great, but Greg is
> about to change the some of the interfaces in 2.0.
>
> My first step would be to implement a version of 1.x (but keep 2.0) in mind
> (Because I need it now in a production e
Hi Doug,
>
> if you implement an interface to mod_dav that works with both 1.x and 2.x,
> that would be great and then we can skip the inclusion of an interface
> bundled with modperl-2.0. or we could have two, your 1.x version on cpan,
> and a 2.x version bundled with modperl-2.0. i'm not sur
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Gerald Richter wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> do you have any plans for supporting mod_dav (which is now part of Apache
> 2.0) in mod_perl 2.0 ?
yes, i would like to have an auto-generated interface for 2.0, but have
not looked at mod_dav yet.
> The reason for my question is, that
Hi Doug,
do you have any plans for supporting mod_dav (which is now part of Apache
2.0) in mod_perl 2.0 ?
The reason for my question is, that I am about to start to write a Perl
interface to mod_dav, so you can create a custom repository (which let you
store data and properties, or manage ACL or