On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> ah, that makes sense. i don't really like the name APR::Lib anyhow,
> thinking changing it to APR::Util would be the right thing todo.
> because even if we fixup the test %INC, Lib.pm would still get installed
> in the wrong place.
OK, that's great
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Randy Kobes wrote:
> There is a blib/lib/Lib.pm, which is identical to
> blib/lib/APR/Lib.pm. I think what's happened is that the
> Makefile.PL in WrapXS/APR/ sees a 'Lib' subdirectory, and,
> ignoring the case, treats it like a 'lib' subdirectory and
> dutifully copies the
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Running the modperl-2 tests on Win32 runs into
> > problems of not finding things in @INC. I think this is
> > because when @INC is set in the add_inc sub
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Randy Kobes wrote:
> Hi,
> Running the modperl-2 tests on Win32 runs into
> problems of not finding things in @INC. I think this is
> because when @INC is set in the add_inc sub of
> Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestConfig.pm, the "lib.pm" that&#
Hi,
Running the modperl-2 tests on Win32 runs into
problems of not finding things in @INC. I think this is
because when @INC is set in the add_inc sub of
Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestConfig.pm, the "lib.pm" that's
being picked up is not Perl's system lib.pm but rather
