On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> that's cool, 1.x has similar:
> skip_test unless have_module 'Foo';
yeah i knew i horked the concept from you somewhere along
the line :)
> i just found it shorter/cleaner to write:
>
> plan tests => 6, \&condition;
>
> especially since &condition c
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, brian moseley wrote:
>
> fwiw, i've come up with a couple of other useful shorthand
> routines for my Wombat::Test package:
...
> they allow me to do stuff like this at the beginning of each
> test file:
>
> skip_all $@ unless have_lib qw(mod_perl Foo Apache::FakeRequest
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> already there more or less. See perldoc Apache::Test in
> cvs.
my "skip_all unless have_lib" is just shorthand for a very
common requirement. it shouldn't replace the more general,
powerful and verbose "plan unless condition", but it does
save a lot of t
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, brian moseley wrote:
>
> fwiw, i've come up with a couple of other useful shorthand
> routines for my Wombat::Test package:
>
> sub have_lib {
> for (@_) {
> unless (eval "require $_") {
> $@ = "$_ not found\n" if $@ =~ /^Can't locate/;
>
fwiw, i've come up with a couple of other useful shorthand
routines for my Wombat::Test package:
sub have_lib {
for (@_) {
unless (eval "require $_") {
$@ = "$_ not found\n" if $@ =~ /^Can't locate/;
return undef;
}
}
return 1;
