Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-09-01 Thread Gerald Richter
Hi Randy, >I'll > look at this tomorrow (it's late here), and get back to you then. > Great! If you need any help let me know. My free time is very very limited at the moment, but when I find some free time I could also install ActiveState here and test it out. Gerald

Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-09-01 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > I'll be testing on NT and also testing AxKit today. Very exciting news for > my business! I also looked at AxKit ... Some juggling has to be done to get the header files in place (I just did it manually to start with). Then, the define flags /D "_WINSOC

Re: cvs commit: modperl ToDo

2000-09-01 Thread Stas Bekman
On 1 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > dougm 00/08/31 22:22:16 > > Modified:.ToDo > Log: > yippe > > Revision ChangesPath > 1.248 +0 -2 modperl/ToDo > > Index: ToDo > === > RCS

Re: cvs commit: modperl ToDo

2000-09-01 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > On 1 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > dougm 00/08/31 22:22:16 > > > > Modified:.ToDo > > Log: > > yippe > > > > Revision ChangesPath > > 1.248 +0 -2 modperl/ToDo > > > > Index: ToDo > > =

Re: cvs commit: modperl ToDo

2000-09-01 Thread Stas Bekman
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > On 1 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > dougm 00/08/31 22:22:16 > > > > > > Modified:.ToDo > > > Log: > > > yippe > > > > > > Revision ChangesPath > > > 1.248

AxKit working on ActivePerl

2000-09-01 Thread Matt Sergeant
Well it seems to be working. Like Randy, I too haven't done much stress testing, and in fact haven't even done much no-stress testing, I just wanted to get a mail out saying I managed to compile it. To get it to compile I had to remove a define (PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS) and add three defines (_MSWSOCK_

Re: AxKit working on ActivePerl

2000-09-01 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > Well it seems to be working. Like Randy, I too haven't done much stress > testing, and in fact haven't even done much no-stress testing, I just > wanted to get a mail out saying I managed to compile it. > > To get it to compile I had to remove a define

Re: AxKit working on ActivePerl

2000-09-01 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Randy Kobes wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > Well it seems to be working. Like Randy, I too haven't done much stress > > testing, and in fact haven't even done much no-stress testing, I just > > wanted to get a mail out saying I managed to compile it. >

Re: AxKit working on ActivePerl

2000-09-01 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Randy Kobes wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > > >and a whole bunch of link problems - it wouldn't seem to link > > > to ApacheModulePerl.lib, so I had to add every damn .obj file in that > > > dire

Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-09-01 Thread Gerald Richter
Hi Randy, > I managed to build Embperl with ActivePerl - like Matt mentioned, > adding _WINDOWS to the defines and taking out > -D_PERL_IMPLICIT_SYS from the defines gets rid of the > problems with malloc.h and signal.h. Great! > However, the tests fail - > I've attached the dialogue of 'nm

Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-09-01 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: [ .. ] > The problem is the following warning: > epmain.c(325) : warning C4113: 'int (__cdecl *)(struct sv *,struct magic *)' > differs in parameter lists from 'int (__cdecl *)(struct interpreter *,struct > sv *,struct magic *)' > > The

Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-09-01 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: > P.S. You and Matt talked about a lot of objects that you had to add manualy. > What exactly was neccessary to do? Maybe I have an idea how to fix this, > because I had played a some time around when I made the first version of > Embperl to compile on Wi

Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-09-01 Thread Gerald Richter
> For me, this had to do with some missing symbols in building > libapreq of a while ago (although as Matt mentioned, he didn't > find this recently for libapreq, so things may have changed > since I tried it). However, there are some missing in AxKit. > These symbols don't appear in ApacheModuleP

Re: Status of ActivePerl in CVS

2000-09-01 Thread Gerald Richter
> For some reason ApacheModulePerl.lib doesn't contain the symbols that are > needed by AxKit for its compiled directives. So as usual for Win32 > programming I ended up searching for the strings, and every time I found > one I added in the .obj file that it was found in. It turned out I needed >

RE: $r->get_handlers bug/oversight?

2000-09-01 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 3:04 PM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: $r->get_handlers bug/oversight? > > > > > > > > I don't have any cleanup handlers in httpd.conf - it doesn't

Re: cvs commit: modperl ToDo

2000-09-01 Thread Stas Bekman
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > >- should Apache::Registry use -M or (stat _)[9]? > > > > Doug, what about this thing? Did I miss a patch? In the guide I warn users > > to do $^T = time, if they want to use -M and get the functionali

Re: cvs commit: modperl ToDo

2000-09-01 Thread Stas Bekman
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > > =head1 -M and other time() file tests under mod_perl > > maybe also suggest a PerlFixupHandler: > > sub Apache::PerlBaseTime::handler { > $^T = shift->request_time; > } Hehe, I wrote this item when

Problem with Apache::AuthCookieDBI

2000-09-01 Thread Pires Claudio
Hi everybody, it's me again... I have a problem using Apache::AuthCookieDBI... I cannot launch Apache using this module. First I installed Apache::AuthCookie succesfuly in my RedHat 6.2 system, I tried it and it worked fine... Now, I want to implement session management and I want to use Apache::

Re: AxKit working on ActivePerl

2000-09-01 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > I'm busy this weekend (wedding), so maybe you could take a look at the > post-install thing. It works directly from MakeMaker's POST_INSTALL (I > think thats the right option), and nmake ppd does all the right > things. Also see NNML's ppd file/distribut