> -Original Message-
> From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 3:30 PM
> To: Geoffrey Young
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Apache::Util stuff
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> > oh, ok - I don't have to call bootstr
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, brian moseley wrote:
> would you really trust somebody to write docs that you
> wouldn't trust to write code? i wouldn't. so i don't think
> it should be a concern.
i don't know if 'trust' is the right word. the code/docs split approach
has been working well for the httpd p
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> So what do we decide about documentation style, so we can start
> documenting things as we go? As I've replied to brian's email, I'm in
> favor of inline docs if it doesn't make the code harder to read.
that's fine, i still would rather see each module
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> here is the patch (against cvs) that allows you to:
>
>'run-tests[=N[:mode]]' => ['run the tests',
> {
>N=> 'repeat times',
>mode => '(repeat|rotate|ran
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, brian moseley wrote:
>
> fwiw, i've come up with a couple of other useful shorthand
> routines for my Wombat::Test package:
...
> they allow me to do stuff like this at the beginning of each
> test file:
>
> skip_all $@ unless have_lib qw(mod_perl Foo Apache::FakeRequest
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> should 'sort' be non-exclusive with 'rotate|repeat'? (it won't apply to
> 'random' of course)
>
> but it gets hairy then: --run-tests[=[N][:][order][:][sort]] ?
>
> I'd rather have --run-tests --test_times=N --test_order=ORDER
> --[no]test_sort? Doug?
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> Running a stand-alone:
>
> $ make xs_generate
yeah, that isn't meant be used at the moment.
> unfortunately 'make source_scan' shocks with:
> Expecting parenth after identifier in `apr_sms_t **sms'
> after `apr_sms_t ' at /home/stas/perl-bleed/lib/
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> ok, I did lots of playing around and have come full circle. my problem
> seems to be that
> DynaLoader::bootstrap (as called by Apache::Util/mod_perl.pm) is looking for
> libUtil.so (and variants) instead of resolving the symbols to libhttpd.so.
> wh
>-Original Message-
>From: Doug MacEachern
>To: brian moseley
>Cc: modperl-2.0 dev-list
>Sent: 6/25/01 7:04 PM
>Subject: Re: rfc: 2.0 documentation project thoughts
>
>On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, brian moseley wrote:
>
>> would you really trust somebody to write docs that you
>> wouldn't trust
>-Original Message-
>From: Doug MacEachern
>To: Geoffrey Young
>Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Sent: 6/25/01 7:46 PM
>Subject: RE: Apache::Util stuff
>
>On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
>> ok, I did lots of playing around and have come full circle. my
>problem
>> seems to be that
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> whenever. of course, then we have the problem of docs
> containing docs based on the code in cvs, not the
> current release of modperl.
yeah, i think that's the worst outcome.
> i have the opposite feeling, docs interspersed amongst
> subs drives m
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> that's cool, 1.x has similar:
> skip_test unless have_module 'Foo';
yeah i knew i horked the concept from you somewhere along
the line :)
> i just found it shorter/cleaner to write:
>
> plan tests => 6, \&condition;
>
> especially since &condition c
> > > - something else to look into, a recent bug has been introduced, if
> > > t/TEST -run=2 starts the server, when $SIG{INT} is caught it should
> > > stop the server but does not at the moment.
> >
> > I don't understand why would you want to do that. --run-tests is already a
> > non-stand
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > So what do we decide about documentation style, so we can start
> > documenting things as we go? As I've replied to brian's email, I'm in
> > favor of inline docs if it doesn't make the code harder to read
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > should 'sort' be non-exclusive with 'rotate|repeat'? (it won't apply to
> > 'random' of course)
> >
> > but it gets hairy then: --run-tests[=[N][:][order][:][sort]] ?
> >
> > I'd rather have --run-tests --
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> >
> > Running a stand-alone:
> >
> > $ make xs_generate
>
> yeah, that isn't meant be used at the moment.
ok
> > unfortunately 'make source_scan' shocks with:
> > Expecting parenth after identifier in `apr
16 matches
Mail list logo
