On 16 Jul 2001 17:56:13 -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On 16 Jul 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > However you still need PerlModule AxKit, to load the .so (actually even
> > that's slightly incorrect - I have it working so you can do LoadModule
> > /path/to/AxKit.so).
>
> eek, why would you wa
[Taking this from the apache-infrastructure list]
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> BTW, the
> perl.apache.org folks should note there are many files in
> /www/perl.apache.org that are different than what's in perl-site.
Ok so these are the modified files:
M dist/HEADER.html
M faq
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Vivek Khera wrote:
> Awww, come on Stas! Juice, not beers! I certainly
> don't want my next mod_perl designed by a bunch of
> drunken hackers reading code upside down. ;-)
# XXX: drunk, fix later
> I'll miss you guys this year... got a family wedding to
> attend in Ontari
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is the diff:
> http://perl.apache.org/~sbekman/diff.txt
>
> Can I just delete these and run CVS up, or could please the respective
> owners update the CVS rep so there will be discrepancies? IMHO
> daedalus.apache.org:/www/perl.apache.org/ should be
On 17 Jul 2001, Frank D. Cringle wrote:
> Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here is the diff:
> > http://perl.apache.org/~sbekman/diff.txt
> >
> > Can I just delete these and run CVS up, or could please the respective
> > owners update the CVS rep so there will be discrepancies? IMHO
>
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> While we are all at TPC:
>
> I was thinking that it'd be really cool to have the core- and
> wanna-be-core-developers get together and discuss the plans for 2.0, may
> be have some details kindly explained by Doug. I'd love to have code
> overview to get
On 17 Jul 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> I don't. It's not documented, it was just an experiment. I wanted to see
> if it would work :-)
oh, ok. when you said "that's slightly incorrect", i thought you meant
LoadModule should be used instead of PerlModule.
> Actually I also wanted to see if it w
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 17 Jul 2001, Frank D. Cringle wrote:
> > I don't quite understand how this situation arose, but it seems that
> > the faq*.html files, which are derived from .pods, are formatted
> > differently in the modperl and modperl-site repositories.
>
> probabl
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2001, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>
> > I don't. It's not documented, it was just an experiment. I wanted to see
> > if it would work :-)
>
> oh, ok. when you said "that's slightly incorrect", i thought you meant
> LoadModule should be used instea
Hey guys:
Would you mind someone who is a wanna-be-wanna-be core developer
come and listen (in a corner if I have to)? I would try to stay
out of the way and not cause any problems but I would like to get
a jump start on learning the mod_perl 2.0 internals.
Thanks
Paul E Wilt
Principal Softwar
On 17 Jul 2001, Frank D. Cringle wrote:
> Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 17 Jul 2001, Frank D. Cringle wrote:
> > > I don't quite understand how this situation arose, but it seems that
> > > the faq*.html files, which are derived from .pods, are formatted
> > > differently in the
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > While we are all at TPC:
> >
> > I was thinking that it'd be really cool to have the core- and
> > wanna-be-core-developers get together and discuss the plans for 2.0, may
> > be have some details kindly e
> Would you mind someone who is a wanna-be-wanna-be core developer come
> and listen (in a corner if I have to)? I would try to stay out of the
> way and not cause any problems but I would like to get a jump start on
> learning the mod_perl 2.0 internals.
I feel like an agent :) Sure, come, but
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> Stas Bekman writes:
> > > sure, but i don't drink margarittas, i like beer, gin+tonic or scotch
> > > though :) if we could arrange to borrow an overhead from o'reilly that
> > > would be good, rather than everybuddy huddled around my tiny laptop
>
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > Would you mind someone who is a wanna-be-wanna-be core developer come
> > and listen (in a corner if I have to)? I would try to stay out of the
> > way and not cause any problems but I would like to get a jump start on
> > learning the mod_perl 2.0 int
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> > > Would you mind someone who is a wanna-be-wanna-be core developer come
> > > and listen (in a corner if I have to)? I would try to stay out of the
> > > way and not cause any problems but I would like to
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Stas Bekman wrote:
> You can still bring cranberry juice :) I cannot get a pure one here in
> Singapore :(
well look on the bright side, at least you have those bellie dancers.
> Ok, I've requested the room for Thu eve, since the fiesta event happens on
> Wed. Is that OK,
> "SB" == Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> to cut some of his margarittas quality time to do some work instead. Doug,
SB> considering that each of the attendees buys you say a few beers, would you
SB> consider that?
Awww, come on Stas! Juice, not beers! I certainly don't want my
--On 17/07/01 09:40 -0400 Vivek Khera wrote:
> Awww, come on Stas! Juice, not beers! I certainly don't want my next
> mod_perl designed by a bunch of drunken hackers reading code upside
> down. ;-)
aw man it worked allright the first time around though ;)
--
Eric Cholet
B995 E519 1594 10D0 42
19 matches
Mail list logo
