Re: clones and parent opts

2001-08-08 Thread Stas Bekman
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > > Thinking some more, your solution presented above makes things more > > explicit, which is probably even cleaner, so I guess my idea should be > > scratched :) > > or add a todo and we can think about it mor

Re: cleaning up special handling PerlRequire/PerlSwitches

2001-08-08 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > Since now we have PerlRequire, I suggest the following refactoring: +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: clones and parent opts

2001-08-08 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > Listen 8555 > you don't want to hard code the vhost port, see t/filter/TestFilter/input_msg.pm > PerlOptions +Parent and this is only available with ithreads+threaded mpm. we need to start the server with -DTHREADED_MPM or similar so this can be

Re: clones and parent opts

2001-08-08 Thread Stas Bekman
Doug MacEachern wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > > >>Listen 8555 >> >> > > you don't want to hard code the vhost port, see > t/filter/TestFilter/input_msg.pm ok, cool, I was mainly just trying to see whether it works, not to make a real patch yet. > >>PerlOptions +P

RE: Looking for magic in Apache->request

2001-08-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
hi Doug... just wondering if this item is still on your radar? --Geoff > -Original Message- > From: Doug MacEachern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 12:51 AM > To: Ken Williams > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Looking for magic in Apache->request > > > O

Re: clones and parent opts

2001-08-08 Thread Doug MacEachern
On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Stas Bekman wrote: > ok, cool, I was mainly just trying to see whether it works, not to make > a real patch yet. ok. > Oh, yeah, I see now that it's only mentioned in the docs, not tests > available. What would be a nice to test to write. Will the require of > identical

Re: Makefile.PL problem

2001-08-08 Thread Tom Lancaster
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:06:27AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > Feel free to contibute to these notes. I'll start the doc project with > more structured layout very soon now :) > Wow. Time flies, and a power cut deleted my expansive edits to the pod. Anyway, here's one essential thing that needs

Re: Makefile.PL problem

2001-08-08 Thread Stas Bekman
On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Tom Lancaster wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:06:27AM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > > Feel free to contibute to these notes. I'll start the doc project with > > more structured layout very soon now :) > > > Wow. Time flies, and a power cut deleted my expansive edits to the p