Dave Rolsky wrote:
> This is available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~autarch/Apache-SizeLimit-0.9.tar.gz
FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE i386
mod_perl 1.29 (static compile)
httpd 1.3.36
mm 1.4.0
mod_ssl-2.8.27-1.3.36
perl 5.8.8 no ithreads
Apache-Test (svn trunk)
gcc 3.4.4
I'm looking in to this, but I do
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=18230
I'm not entirely sure whats correct anymore, I'm going to ask on question (at)
FreeBSD (dot) org
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Dave Rolsky wrote:
>> This is available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~autarch/Apache-SizeLimit-0.9.tar.gz
> FreeBSD 6
Hi, I'm trying do determine the units for one of the fields returned by
getrusage(2)
man page on 6.0-RELEASE-p5 says this:
2 maxrss maximum shared memory or current resident set
3 ixrss integral shared memory
ru_ixrss
an ``integral'' value indicating the amount of memory used
by the text segment
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi, I'm trying do determine the units for one of the fields returned by
getrusage(2)
man page on 6.0-RELEASE-p5 says this:
2 maxrss maximum shared memory or current resident set
3 ixrss integral shared memory
ru_ixrss
an ``integral'' value indicat
> Doesn't that imply that it's in kb per stat clock ticks?
I think you read it backwards, but I agree with the outcome.
svn diff
Index: lib/Apache/SizeLimit.pm
===
--- lib/Apache/SizeLimit.pm (revision 419830)
+++ lib/Apache/SizeL
server localhost:8529 started
t/apache/basic.ok
t/apache/deprecatedok
t/pod..ok
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=18, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.98 cusr + 0.12 csys = 1.09 CPU)
[warning] server localhost:8529 shutdown
[That was from svn trunk, after patch applied]
--
http://people.apache.org/~autarch/Apache-SizeLimit-0.9-rc2.tar.gz
This RC differs from the previous RC primarily in a major bug fix for
shared memory calculations in BSDs. Apparently the module had been
calculating this as 1024 times bigger than was being reported, which would
make for some ve
Dave Rolsky wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~autarch/Apache-SizeLimit-0.9-rc2.tar.gz
I'd just announce it to the dev list and the main mod_perl list at the
same time :)
aside from the Makefile.PL bit I just committed all tests pass for me on
fc5.
I'd be sure to give this RC ample time to marin
Geoffrey Young wrote:
but since this is your first release here
> it's probably wise to have someone else just give the tarball a final
> whirl and help you through the rest of the RELEASE steps (tagging,
> upload to perl.apache.org, etc) if you need it in case your karma still
> isn't where it nee
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Geoffrey Young wrote:
I'd be sure to give this RC ample time to marinate before making another
RC or suggesting an official release. in particular I'd like to see if
torsten eventually weighs in. but I wouldn't let him hold things up too
long.
I was hoping to do a real re
> I was hoping to do a real release sometime next week, maybe Wednesday or
> so. I don't know that the Makefile.PL thing warrants another RC,
> especially given that AFAICT no one on the users list tested the first RC.
that sounds fine to me.
>
>> when the time comes to actually release I'd mak
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
> but since this is your first release here
>
>>it's probably wise to have someone else just give the tarball a final
>>whirl and help you through the rest of the RELEASE steps (tagging,
>>upload to perl.apache.org, etc) if you need it in case your
Geoffrey Young wrote:
> Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>> Geoffrey Young wrote:
> speaking of which, are the permissions properly set in CPAN so it won't
> reject an upload from dave?
I'm not entirely sure I have full privs for AMPL on CPAN, I can see existing
ones,
but I can't grant them Last tim
13 matches
Mail list logo
