Re: RT 32992

2010-04-16 Thread Vick Khera
On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Fred Moyer wrote: > https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992 > > Taking a poll again of who supports this issue resolution. Given that > the previous stable version of perl (5.10.1) has version.pm bundled > (current version is 5.12.0), I think this is safe

Re: RT 32992

2010-04-16 Thread Torsten Förtsch
On Friday 16 April 2010 04:02:17 Fred Moyer wrote: > https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992 > > Taking a poll again of who supports this issue resolution. Given that > the previous stable version of perl (5.10.1) has version.pm bundled > (current version is 5.12.0), I think this is safe

Re: lets not forget we are a CTR PMC

2010-04-16 Thread Fred Moyer
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Thats Commit Then Review.  Its a VC we can always revert things. True, but I think that reverting things rarely (if ever) happens. > The RTC (Review Then Committ) suggestion is only for new committers while > they get acclimated. Unles

Re: RT 32992

2010-04-16 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 04/16/10 13:47, Vick Khera wrote: On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Fred Moyer wrote: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992 Taking a poll again of who supports this issue resolution. Given that the previous stable version of perl (5.10.1) has version.pm bundled (current version is

Re: RT 32992

2010-04-16 Thread Fred Moyer
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 04/16/10 13:47, Vick Khera wrote: >> >> On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Fred Moyer wrote: >> >>> https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=32992 >>> >>> Taking a poll again of who supports this issue resolution.  Given that >>> the pr

Re: RT 32992

2010-04-16 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 04/16/10 19:11, Fred Moyer wrote: Does anyone have 5.6.x to test with? I know of a couple shops using 5.6, but they monkey patched it, and will probably never upgrade. with mp2 ? wow. I see 5.8 being widely used still for years to come. yes sir. its all moot anyway until 2.0.5 is out the

Re: RT 32992

2010-04-16 Thread Fred Moyer
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 04/16/10 19:11, Fred Moyer wrote: >> >> Does anyone have 5.6.x to test with? >> >> I know of a couple shops using 5.6, but they monkey patched it, and >> will probably never upgrade. > > with mp2 ? wow. mp1. >> I see 5.8 being wide

Re: lets not forget we are a CTR PMC

2010-04-16 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
On 10-04-16 15:01 , Fred Moyer wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Philip M. Gollucci > wrote: >> Thats Commit Then Review. Its a VC we can always revert things. > > True, but I think that reverting things rarely (if ever) happens. > >> The RTC (Review Then Committ) suggestion is only for