Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Reload 0.11 RC1

2010-08-10 Thread Adam Prime
-1 Syntax error on line 19 of /tmp/Apache-Reload-0.11-rc1/t/conf/extra.last.conf: syntax error at /tmp/Apache-Reload-0.11-rc1/blib/lib/Apache/Reload.pm line 21, near "==" I'm not really sure what's going on here, the version in the archive doesn't seem to be the same as the version in SVN.

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Reload 0.11 RC1

2010-08-10 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 8/10/2010 4:01 PM, Adam Prime wrote: -1 Syntax error on line 19 of /tmp/Apache-Reload-0.11-rc1/t/conf/extra.last.conf: syntax error at /tmp/Apache-Reload-0.11-rc1/blib/lib/Apache/Reload.pm line 21, near "==" Attach that file or link to it. I never looked at the svn version just the archive.

Re: svn commit: r984198 - /perl/Apache-Reload/trunk/lib/Apache/Reload.pm

2010-08-10 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Well how the hell did it work for me ? On 8/10/2010 4:18 PM, ph...@apache.org wrote: Author: phred Date: Tue Aug 10 20:18:35 2010 New Revision: 984198 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=984198&view=rev Log: Add global %Ignore variable. Thanks to Adam Prime for the spot. Modified: per

Re: svn commit: r984198 - /perl/Apache-Reload/trunk/lib/Apache/Reload.pm

2010-08-10 Thread Adam Prime
we talked about this in IRC. it probably worked for you because you tested under mp2 i'm guessing. It tested fine on all my mp2 machines. Adam Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Well how the hell did it work for me ? On 8/10/2010 4:18 PM, ph...@apache.org wrote: Author: phred Date: Tue Aug 10 20:1

Re: svn commit: r984198 - /perl/Apache-Reload/trunk/lib/Apache/Reload.pm

2010-08-10 Thread Fred Moyer
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Adam Prime wrote: > we talked about this in IRC.  it probably worked for you because you tested > under mp2 i'm guessing.  It tested fine on all my mp2 machines. It failed when I tested under mp1; something I initially didn't test for. RC2 corrects that mistake.

Re: svn commit: r984198 - /perl/Apache-Reload/trunk/lib/Apache/Reload.pm

2010-08-10 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
On 8/10/2010 11:22 PM, Fred Moyer wrote: On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Adam Prime wrote: we talked about this in IRC. it probably worked for you because you tested under mp2 i'm guessing. It tested fine on all my mp2 machines. It failed when I tested under mp1; something I initially didn