Fred Moyer wrote on 2011-02-02:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Steve Hay wrote:
>> +1 on Windows XP / 5.12.2 / 2.2.17 (except for t\apache\subprocess.t
>> tests 2-5 which also failed with 2.0.4)
>>
>> I also have a strange problem whereby a VS2010 release build refuses
> to start up on Windows
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:27 PM, David Dick wrote:
> ---
> t/filter/both_str_req_mix.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
> Non-zero exit status: 255
> Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 1 tests but ran 0.
>
> Fedora 14 comes with
>
> Apache/2.2.17 (Unix)
> perl-5.12.2
On 02/01/11 07:37, Fred Moyer wrote:
>>> - how long do we want to support old perl versions?
100% in favor of dropping < 5.8.[89]
>>>
>>> For example, modern perls do not support anything but the perlio model.
>>> Stdio
>>> was officially dropped in 5.8.7 or so. If you need to change some of the
On 02/01/11 07:32, Fred Moyer wrote:
> Another thing that comes to mind after rolling the 2.0.5 rc is that we
> should start shipping the Apache-* based modules separately as CPAN
> distributions when we release 2.0.6.
Last I heard this was for historical reasons, but I'm like hey this 2.x.
We can
On 02/01/11 07:37, Fred Moyer wrote:
> Actually, I think it would be more appropriate to do 2.0.6 with the
> Apache::* decoupling, then 2.2.0 for the APR::* decoupling.
>
This would also pave the way for APR::DBD wrappers for mod_dbd which
I've been interested in for quite some time but enotime.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:21 PM, David Dick wrote:
> On 04/02/11 08:20, Fred Moyer wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:27 PM, David Dick wrote:
>>>
>>> ---
>>> t/filter/both_str_req_mix.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
>>> Non-zero exit status: 255
>>> Parse error
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> /etc/httpd/httpd.conf file is basically unmodified, you may get some
Make that modified, not unmodified. I turned off a number of
LoadModule directives in my Centos httpd to save memory despite having
16 gigs in the box :o
