perl 5.14 & modperl - please test

2011-05-20 Thread Torsten Förtsch
Hi, users of a threaded modperl (esp. Windows), please test modperl trunk with perl 5.14! On my linux box it works now (rev 1125476). Torsten Förtsch -- Need professional modperl support? Hire me! (http://foertsch.name) Like fantasy? http://kabatinte.net

Apache::Test & LWP 6.x - don't

2011-05-20 Thread Torsten Förtsch
Hi, if someone needs a nice little project that requires only Perl skills convert A::T to the new LWP 6.x and/or fix the bugs in LWP 6. Currently, the combination of A::T and LWP 6 is not really usable. Modperl tests work mostly, though, sometimes they simply hang. For example I had a test (mo

Re: Apache::Test & LWP 6.x - don't

2011-05-20 Thread Fred Moyer
That sounds like a bug in LWP. Have you contacted the maintainer? 2011/5/20 Torsten Förtsch : > Hi, > > if someone needs a nice little project that requires only Perl skills > convert A::T to the new LWP 6.x and/or fix the bugs in LWP 6. > > Currently, the combination of A::T and LWP 6 is not rea

Re: Apache::Test & LWP 6.x - don't

2011-05-20 Thread Joe Schaefer
I wouldn't trust the LWP maintainers based on some of the recent decisions they've made. - Original Message > From: Fred Moyer > To: Torsten Förtsch > Cc: dev@perl.apache.org > Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 2:19:56 PM > Subject: Re: Apache::Test & LWP 6.x - don't > > That sounds like a bug

[PATCH] New default sort order in Apache-Test-1.36 (WAS: test framework and latest Fedora)

2011-05-20 Thread Rainer Jung
I noticed, that the SMOKE change in 1.36 also introduced a new sorting behaviour. In the change the test suite was running by default using the repeat order, that means the tests were ordered alpabetically. Now the default order is random. Furthermore the -order=rotate (A B C A B C) is gone, and

Re: Apache::Test & LWP 6.x - don't

2011-05-20 Thread Perrin Harkins
I agree with Fred. If presented with a failing test case, they are likely to want to fix it. - Perrin On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > I wouldn't trust the LWP maintainers based on some of the recent > decisions they've made. > > > > - Original Message >> From: Fr

Re: Apache::Test & LWP 6.x - don't

2011-05-20 Thread Fred Moyer
Especially so considering Gisle wrote the first incarnation of mod_perl :) On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote: > I agree with Fred.  If presented with a failing test case, they are > likely to want to fix it. > > - Perrin > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote

Re: Apache::Test & LWP 6.x - don't

2011-05-20 Thread Joe Schaefer
Didn't realize he's still working on LWP. Consider my remarks retracted in that case. - Original Message > From: Fred Moyer > To: Perrin Harkins > Cc: Joe Schaefer ; Torsten Förtsch >; dev@perl.apache.org > Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 6:22:45 PM > Subject: Re: Apache::Test & LWP 6.x - do