Re: Windows binaries

2012-08-31 Thread Michiel Beijen
Hi Steve, > Steve Hay wrote: > > However, I'm unlikely to go ahead with this now anyway since there > seems to be little need for it. That's good news, really, since it > indicates that building mod_perl is not a difficult thing anyway :-) It might be you asked on the wrong mailing list; or tha

Re: Windows binaries

2012-08-31 Thread Shane McCarron
I concur! We have a number of clients who use Apache + Strawberry Perl and we would benefit from something more recent than the SP 5.12 version of 2.04 that we currently recommend. On 8/31/2012 5:33 AM, Michiel Beijen wrote: Hi Steve, Steve Hay wrote: However, I'm unlikely to go ahead with

Re: Windows binaries

2012-08-31 Thread Steve Hay
In the light of sufficient interest from enough people, I've now created and uploaded binary builds of mod_perl-2.0.7 and libapreq2-2.13 components compatible with Apache Lounge 2.2.23 Build 24 August 2012 (win32) and each of: * ActivePerl 5.16.0 Build 1600 (x86) * Strawberry Perl 5.16.0 Build 1 (