Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.11 RC3

2019-09-26 Thread Jie Gao
My test result as follows: t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t . 1/? # Failed test 22 in t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t at line 58 fail #6 # Failed test 26 in t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t at line 58 fail #7 # Failed test 30 in t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t at line 58 fail #8 Test

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.10 RC2

2016-10-06 Thread Jie Gao
I got the same test failures as with RC1, on the same platform reported earlier: t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t . 1/? # Failed test 22 in t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t at line 58 fail #6 # Failed test 26 in t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t at line 58 fail #7 # Failed test 30 in

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.10 RC1

2016-10-02 Thread Jie Gao
Using httpd-2.4.23: # lsb_release -a LSB Version: :base-4.0-amd64:base-4.0-noarch:core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-amd64:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-amd64:printing-4.0-noarch Distributor ID: RedHatEnterpriseServer Description:Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.8

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.40 RC1

2016-08-27 Thread Jie Gao
I have just tried to build mod_perl from mod_perl-SVN as at Sun Aug 28 03:25:32 UTC 2016, "make test" hang at: t/protocol/eliza.t .. 1/7 Further testing: waiting 300 seconds for server to start: .[Sun Aug 28 13:49:17.900567 2016] [env:warn] [pid 18374:tid

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.40 RC1

2016-08-25 Thread Jie Gao
> > +1 on RHEL6.8: > > > > Bundled Perl v5.10.1 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build). > > Without mod_perl-SVN and with LWP-5.833. > > > +1 on Ubuntu v16.04.1: > > > > Bundled Perl v5.22.1 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build). > > Without mod_perl-SVN and with

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.40 RC1

2016-08-25 Thread Jie Gao
> +1 on RHEL6.8: > > Perl v5.20.2 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build). Without mod_perl-SVN and with LWP-5.835. -Jie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@perl.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.40 RC1

2016-08-25 Thread Jie Gao
+1 on RHEL6.8: Bundled Perl v5.10.1 + Apache 2.2.31 (with default configuration build). Perl v5.20.2 + Apache 2.2.31 (with default configuration build). +1 on Ubuntu v16.04.1: Bundled Perl v5.22.1 + Apache 2.2.31 (with default configuration build). -Jie

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.40 RC1

2016-08-25 Thread Jie Gao
+1 on RHEL6.8: Bundled Perl v5.10.1 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build). +1 on Ubuntu v16.04.1: Bundled Perl v5.22.1 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build). * Steve Hay wrote: > Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:09:24 +0100 > From: Steve Hay

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Test-1.40 RC1

2016-08-25 Thread Jie Gao
+1 on RHEL6.8: Perl v5.20.2 + Apache 2.4.23 (with default configuration build). . * Steve Hay wrote: > Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:09:24 +0100 > From: Steve Hay > To: Steve Hay > CC: test-...@perl.apache.org,

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] Apache-Reload 0.13 RC2

2016-07-13 Thread Jie Gao
* Ruben Safir <ru...@mrbrklyn.com> wrote: > Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:48:03 -0400 > From: Ruben Safir <ru...@mrbrklyn.com> > To: Jie Gao <j@sydney.edu.au> > CC: Steve Hay <steve.m@googlemail.com>, dev@perl.apache.org, > "modp...@perl.apache.

Re: New segfault with 2.4.20 with mod_perl

2016-05-29 Thread Jie Gao
/local/httpd-2.4.20/bin/httpd -core /usr/local/src/mod_perl-2.0/t/core.15035 -Jie * Jie Gao <j@sydney.edu.au> wrote: > Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 16:02:17 +1000 > From: Jie Gao <j@sydney.edu.au> > To: dev@perl.apache.org, modp...@perl.apache.org > CC: William A Rowe

Re: New segfault with 2.4.20 with mod_perl

2016-05-29 Thread Jie Gao
Hi All I wonder if anybody is looking at this issue. At the moment, the build cores even at the end of generating a Makefile. If not, I would like to get my hands dirty in an attmpt to get the ball rolling. Any help on how to get a handle on the "ip comparisons" recommended by W. Rowe Jr

Re: mod_perl2 on CentOS 6 compile issue

2013-04-03 Thread Jie Gao
Hi Fairlight There is currently no mod_perl release that's compatible with Apache 2.2.24 yet. However, the errors you are getting are not the typical ones that one gets compiling with Apache 2.2.24. If you compile with an version of Apache lower than 2.2.24 and still have problems, you should

Re: mod_perl2 on CentOS 6 compile issue

2013-04-03 Thread Jie Gao
Hi Fred Sorry, my mistake, for I thought it was thinking 2.4.4! Regards, Jie Gao | Systems Administrator Information and Communications Technology THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY 316 Abercrombie Street Building G17 | The University of Sydney | NSW | 2006 T +61 2 8627 7824 | E j@sydney.edu.au

Dead link: http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/devel/core/coding_style.html

2013-02-08 Thread Jie Gao
Hi I've found a dead link on this page: http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/devel/core/coding_style.html For mod_perl's C code follows the Apache style guide. This should be updated to: http://httpd.apache.org/dev/styleguide.html Cheers, Jie

Re: Core Dump on Perl 5.14

2011-07-15 Thread Jie Gao
ithreads problem? See: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.mod-perl/5386 -Jie * David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com wrote: Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 23:22:39 -0700 From: David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com To: mod_perl Dev dev@perl.apache.org Subject: Core Dump on Perl 5.14

Re: mod_perl 2.0.4: $r-uri

2011-06-06 Thread Jie Gao
Thanks for your reply. Now if I want to get a work-around within mod_perl, what would you do? Jie Gao | Systems Administrator Information and Communications Technology THE UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY 316 Abercrombie Street Building G17 | The University of Sydney | NSW | 2006 T +61 2 8627 7824 | E j

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.5

2011-02-09 Thread Jie Gao
* Randolf Richardson rand...@modperl.pl wrote: Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:22:06 -0800 From: Randolf Richardson rand...@modperl.pl To: mod_perl Dev dev@perl.apache.org, mod_perl list modp...@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 2.0.5 X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows

Re: perl5.10.1 and mod_perl 2.0.4 break on my_perl

2010-08-07 Thread Jie Gao
Download the lastest snapshot. I got a screenful of test failures with this combination, with the latest Apache 2.2, with mod_perl 2.0.4 yesterday. The snapshot tested clean. -Jie * Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com wrote: Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 18:15:25 -0700 From: Randal L. Schwartz

Re: perl5.10.1 and mod_perl 2.0.4 break on my_perl

2010-08-07 Thread Jie Gao
* Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com wrote: Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2010 21:07:35 -0700 From: Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com To: Jie Gao j@isu.usyd.edu.au Cc: mod_perl Dev dev@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: perl5.10.1 and mod_perl 2.0.4 break on my_perl User-Agent: Gnus/5.13

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.2 RC1 All tests successful on solaris 9 sparc

2005-10-12 Thread Jie Gao
Hi All, perl-5.8.3_threaded + apache_2.0.49 on SunOS 5.9 Generic_118558-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10: All tests successful. Regards, Jie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.2 RC1 All tests successful on solaris 9 sparc

2005-10-12 Thread Jie Gao
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Jie Gao wrote: Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:21:13 +1000 (EST) From: Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mod_perl Dev dev@perl.apache.org, mod_perl list modperl@perl.apache.org Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.2 RC1 All tests successful on solaris 9 sparc

Re: RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-2.0.1 RC1

2005-06-13 Thread Jie Gao
builds and tests fine on sunos 5.8 generic_108528-11 sun4u sparc sunw,ultra-5_10 based on perl5 (revision 5 version 8 subversion 5) + Apache/2.0.54 (prefork and DSO). Jie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl 1.99_19 (2.0.0-RC2-XMas)

2004-12-23 Thread Jie Gao
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all mp developers. Thank you very much! Jie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: how to raise entropy

2004-12-22 Thread Jie Gao
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 18:11:30 -0500 From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mod_perl Dev dev@perl.apache.org Subject: how to raise entropy The story goes like this, I run a smoke of some 70+ mp2 configurations every other night, and very often I

mod_perl 1.99_18 (2.0.0-RC1) test results

2004-12-12 Thread Jie Gao
Apache/2.0.51 (prefork MPM) + perl-5.8.5_non_threaded on Debian Woody (stable): All tests passed. Apache/2.0.51 (prefork) + perl5.8.3 non_threaded on Solaris 8: All tests passed. -Jie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

[mp2] modperl-2.0_20041207171655 test fails

2004-12-08 Thread Jie Gao
make test fails (using Apache/2.0.51 (prefork MPM) on Solaris 9): t/api/lookup_urirequest has failed (the response code was: 500) see t/logs/error_log for more details t/api/lookup_uridubious Test returned status 29 (wstat 7424, 0x1d00)

Re: [mp2] modperl-2.0_20041207171655 test fails

2004-12-08 Thread Jie Gao
/opt/local/src/modperl-2.0/t/logs/httpd.pid (pid=6046) [Thu Dec 09 08:34:00 2004] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down END in modperl_extra.pl, pid=6046 On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Jie Gao wrote: Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:37:49 +1100 (EST) From: Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: [mp2] modperl-2.0_20041207171655 test fails

2004-12-08 Thread Jie Gao
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 16:45:52 -0500 From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [mp2] modperl-2.0_20041207171655 test fails Jie Gao wrote: make test fails (using Apache/2.0.51 (prefork

Re: [mp2] modperl-2.0_20041207171655 test fails

2004-12-08 Thread Jie Gao
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:03:35 -0500 From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [mp2] modperl-2.0_20041207171655 test fails Jie Gao wrote: Thanks Jie for the detailed report. t/api

Re: [mp2] modperl-2.0_20041207171655 test fails

2004-12-08 Thread Jie Gao
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:54:23 -0500 From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [mp2] modperl-2.0_20041207171655 test fails Jie Gao wrote: Yes, I'm dead sure it was. However, I've just

Re: plans for mp2.0.0 release schedule

2004-12-07 Thread Jie Gao
Just tried to test-build from cvs and got the following: Reading Makefile.PL args from @ARGV MP_DEBUG = 1 MP_USE_DSO = 1 MP_APXS = /usr/local/apache_2.0.49/bin/apxs MP_TRACE = 1 Configuring Apache/2.0.49 mod_perl/1.99_18-dev Perl/v5.8.3 [ info] generating script t/TEST Writing

Re: time for 1.99_15?

2004-08-18 Thread Jie Gao
Hi Stas, perl-5.8.3_threaded + Latest cvs + apache_2.0.49 make test fails with the error: [warning] testing whether 'nobody' is able to -rwx /u0/local/src/modperl-2.0/t /usr/local/perl-5.8.3_threaded/bin/perl

Subject: [mp2] make test fails

2004-08-18 Thread Jie Gao
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:56:48 -0700 From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mod_perl Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: time for 1.99_15? Jie Gao wrote: Hi Stas, perl-5.8.3_threaded + Latest cvs

Re: time for 1.99_15?

2004-08-18 Thread Jie Gao
PROTECTED] On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:56:48 -0700 From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mod_perl Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: time for 1.99_15? Jie Gao wrote: Hi Stas, perl-5.8.3_threaded + Latest cvs

Re: time for 1.99_15?

2004-08-18 Thread Jie Gao
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:34:47 -0700 From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mod_perl Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: time for 1.99_15? Jie Gao wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Wed

Re: time for 1.99_15?

2004-08-18 Thread Jie Gao
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: - It required Chatbot::Eliza for make test to be successful; why? what was the error? the test should have been skipped, no? I don't think it was skipped. But how do we know what was the error, if you didn't copy and paste the error? :)

Re: time for 1.99_15?

2004-08-18 Thread Jie Gao
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:59:23 -0700 From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: mod_perl Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: time for 1.99_15? Jie Gao wrote: On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Stas Bekman wrote

[mp2] modperl_env.c: segmentation fault

2004-05-28 Thread Jie Gao
-8-- Start Bug Report 8-- 1. Problem Description: Child exits with seg fault when registry script is accessed. 2. Used Components and their Configuration: *** mod_perl version 1.9914 *** using lib/Apache/BuildConfig.pm *** Makefile.PL options: MP_APXS

Re: [mp2] bug report: modperl_env.c

2004-04-10 Thread Jie Gao
(gdb) run -X -f /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf -k start -DSSL -X Stas wrote: Thanks for the trace with args, Jie, but it gives no new info. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to LWP 12] 0xfea9bbbc in modperl_env_request_tie (my_perl=0x1026fe0, r=0x17a8c78) at

Re: [mp2] bug report: modperl_env.c

2004-04-02 Thread Jie Gao
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:23:06 -0800 From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [mp2] bug report: modperl_env.c Jie Gao wrote: -8-- Start Bug Report 8

Re: [mp2] bug report: modperl_env.c

2004-04-02 Thread Jie Gao
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 19:23:06 -0800 From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jie Gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [mp2] bug report: modperl_env.c Jie Gao wrote: -8-- Start Bug Report 8

[mp2] bug report: modperl_env.c

2004-03-30 Thread Jie Gao
-8-- Start Bug Report 8-- 1. Problem Description: Apache segmentation faults trying to run a registry script. 2. Used Components and their Configuration: *** mod_perl version 1.9914 From CVS just a couple of hourse ago. *** using