[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-1217) Spool GROUP BY to disk using HBase itself

2014-08-28 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
James Taylor created PHOENIX-1217: - Summary: Spool GROUP BY to disk using HBase itself Key: PHOENIX-1217 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1217 Project: Phoenix Issue Type:

[GitHub] phoenix pull request: Phoenix 180

2014-08-28 Thread ramkrish86
Github user ramkrish86 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/8#discussion_r16830455 --- Diff: phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/iterate/DefaultParallelIteratorRegionSplitter.java --- @@ -138,14 +146,10 @@ public boolean

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.1.0 RC1

2014-08-28 Thread Steven Noels
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote: [X] +1 approve Steven.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.1.0 RC1

2014-08-28 Thread Gabriel Reid
+1 Validated signatures in src and bin distributions, basic check of LICENSE and NOTICE files, checked tags in git compared to contents of src distribution, ran rat, and ran full integration test suite for both hadoop1 and hadoop2 profiles. - Gabriel On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Steven

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-1218) Integration tests can't be run for hadoop2 on 3.x branch

2014-08-28 Thread Gabriel Reid (JIRA)
Gabriel Reid created PHOENIX-1218: - Summary: Integration tests can't be run for hadoop2 on 3.x branch Key: PHOENIX-1218 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1218 Project: Phoenix

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.1.0 RC3

2014-08-28 Thread Steven Noels
Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Please vote: [X] +1 approve Steven.

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-1139) Failed to disable local index when index update fails

2014-08-28 Thread rajeshbabu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] rajeshbabu updated PHOENIX-1139: Attachment: PHOENIX-1139.patch Here is the patch to disable local indexes on update failures.

RE: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.1.0 RC1

2014-08-28 Thread rajeshbabu chintaguntla
+1 1) verified signing 2) performed local index related tests against hbase 0.98.2 in 2 node cluster. 3) Ran some kill and restart cases. All looks good. 4) ran examples. 5) Ran some tests related auto rebuilding indexes on update failures. Thanks, Rajeshbabu.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.1.0 RC1

2014-08-28 Thread Eli Levine
+1 from me. Ran this through an internal Salesforce integration test suite and things look good. On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Mujtaba Chohan mujt...@apache.org wrote: +1. 1. Verified deployment on cluster. 2. Verified performance is on par with last release. //mujtaba On Thu, Aug

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.1.0 RC3

2014-08-28 Thread James Taylor
+1 On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Mujtaba Chohan mujt...@apache.org wrote: +1. 1. Verified deployment on cluster. 2. Verified performance is on par with last release. //mujtaba On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Steven Noels stev...@satisa.be wrote: Vote will be open for at least 72

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.1.0 RC1

2014-08-28 Thread James Taylor
+1 On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Eli Levine elilev...@gmail.com wrote: +1 from me. Ran this through an internal Salesforce integration test suite and things look good. On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Mujtaba Chohan mujt...@apache.org wrote: +1. 1. Verified deployment on cluster.

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1195) Add How to do a Release documentation on website

2014-08-28 Thread Mujtaba Chohan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14114664#comment-14114664 ] Mujtaba Chohan commented on PHOENIX-1195: - Doc. started at

HashJoin become slower or even fail due to use of ChunkedResultIterator

2014-08-28 Thread 孟庆义(孟庆义)
Dears: My use case is “ select * from A inner join B on xx where xx ”. A has about 400m rows, but the result only has few rows. Problem 1: before ChunkedResultIterator, SpoolingResultIterators will run in parallel when they created in ParallelIterators. Now they work in a serial way. In

Top-N query

2014-08-28 Thread Suvra Dutta
Hi all, As per the phoenix performance link( http://phoenix.apache.org/performance.html) the following query should take only 6-7 secs over 10M records. select core from t order by core desc limit 10 However, when I run a similar query on a non-rowkey column over only 1M records, it is taking

Re: HashJoin become slower or even fail due to use of ChunkedResultIterator

2014-08-28 Thread James Taylor
Hello, This issue was fixed with PHOENIX-1188 which is in our 3.1/4.1 release. Would you mind trying on the newly released version? There's a configuration parameter, phoenix.query.scanResultChunkSize, that controls after how many rows chunking starts. The default value is 2999, so if the total

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1208) Check for existence of views doesn't take into account the fact that SYSTEM.CATALOG could be split across regions

2014-08-28 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14114887#comment-14114887 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-1208: - SUCCESS: Integrated in Phoenix | Master | Hadoop1

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-1208) Check for existence of views doesn't take into account the fact that SYSTEM.CATALOG could be split across regions

2014-08-28 Thread James Taylor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-1208. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.2 4.2 5.0.0

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-1203) Uable to work for count (distinct col) queries via phoenix table with secondary indexes

2014-08-28 Thread Sun Fulin (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14114890#comment-14114890 ] Sun Fulin commented on PHOENIX-1203: [~anoop.hbase] Any progress about the test?