[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2834) Support Phoenix over CDH 5.7.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323883#comment-15323883 ] Ankur Jain commented on PHOENIX-2834: - Also i have deleted old patches that i put in as they do not

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2834) Support Phoenix over CDH 5.7.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankur Jain updated PHOENIX-2834: Attachment: (was: PHOENIX-2834.master.patch) > Support Phoenix over CDH 5.7.0 >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2834) Support Phoenix over CDH 5.7.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankur Jain updated PHOENIX-2834: Attachment: (was: PHOENIX-2834.patch) > Support Phoenix over CDH 5.7.0 >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2834) Support Phoenix over CDH 5.7.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323882#comment-15323882 ] Ankur Jain commented on PHOENIX-2834: - sorry for the delays. I was successfully able to build

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2982) Keep the number of active handlers balanced across salt buckets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323768#comment-15323768 ] Hadoop QA commented on PHOENIX-2982: {color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2982) Keep the number of active handlers balanced across salt buckets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Junegunn Choi updated PHOENIX-2982: --- Attachment: PHOENIX-2982.patch > Keep the number of active handlers balanced across salt

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2982) Keep the number of active handlers balanced across salt buckets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Junegunn Choi updated PHOENIX-2982: --- Attachment: cpu-util-without-patch.png cpu-util-with-patch.png The attached

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-2982) Keep the number of active handlers balanced across salt buckets

Junegunn Choi created PHOENIX-2982: -- Summary: Keep the number of active handlers balanced across salt buckets Key: PHOENIX-2982 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2982 Project:

[jira] [Reopened] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor reopened PHOENIX-2965: --- Unit tests failing with your last check-in, [~lhofhansl]: Failed tests:

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2892) Scan for pre-warming the block cache for 2ndary index should be removed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323578#comment-15323578 ] Enis Soztutar commented on PHOENIX-2892: Thanks [~jamestaylor] for looking. > Scan for

[ANNOUNCE] Phoenix 4.7 now supported in Amazon EMR

Thanks to some great work over at Amazon, there's now support for Phoenix 4.7 on top of HBase 1.2 in Amazon EMR. Check it out and give it a spin. Detailed step-by-step instructions available here: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/ElasticMapReduce/latest/ReleaseGuide/emr-phoenix.html Thanks, James

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323459#comment-15323459 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2965: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1249 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2980) DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testRVC() is failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323453#comment-15323453 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2980: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1248 (See

[jira] [Assigned] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl reassigned PHOENIX-2965: -- Assignee: Lars Hofhansl > Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lars Hofhansl resolved PHOENIX-2965. Resolution: Fixed Pushed to master, 4.x-0.98, 4.x-1.0, 4.x-1.1 Thanks for looking

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2981) Call Expression.reset() after deserializing boolean expression to initialize for partial evaluation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2981: -- Description: We only *sometimes* call reset initially (only for

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-2981) Call Expression.reset() after deserializing boolean expression to initialize for partial evaluation

James Taylor created PHOENIX-2981: - Summary: Call Expression.reset() after deserializing boolean expression to initialize for partial evaluation Key: PHOENIX-2981 URL:

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2968) Minimize RPCs for ALTER statement over APPEND_ONLY_SCHEMA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323391#comment-15323391 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2968: --- If I understand this correctly, we are still making an

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2980) DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testRVC() is failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323392#comment-15323392 ] Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-2980: Belated +1 > DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testRVC() is

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2968) Minimize RPCs for ALTER statement over APPEND_ONLY_SCHEMA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2968: -- Assignee: Thomas D'Silva (was: James Taylor) > Minimize RPCs for ALTER statement over

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2968) Minimize RPCs for ALTER statement over APPEND_ONLY_SCHEMA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2968: -- Fix Version/s: 4.9.0 > Minimize RPCs for ALTER statement over APPEND_ONLY_SCHEMA >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2968) Minimize RPCs for ALTER statement over APPEND_ONLY_SCHEMA

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2968?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2968: -- Summary: Minimize RPCs for ALTER statement over APPEND_ONLY_SCHEMA (was: Reduce alter

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2980) DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testRVC() is failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323296#comment-15323296 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2980: --- Pushed fix to master and 4.x branches to get our builds

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2980) DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testRVC() is failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-2980. --- Resolution: Fixed > DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testRVC() is failing >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2980) DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testRVC() is failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2980: -- Attachment: PHOENIX-2980.patch Please review my fix, [~lhofhansl]. This test is working more

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2980) DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testRVC() is failing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2980: -- Fix Version/s: 4.8.0 > DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testRVC() is failing >

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-2980) DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testRVC() is failing

James Taylor created PHOENIX-2980: - Summary: DistinctPrefixFilterIT.testRVC() is failing Key: PHOENIX-2980 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2980 Project: Phoenix Issue

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-2979) ScannerLeaseRenewalIT tests are failing

James Taylor created PHOENIX-2979: - Summary: ScannerLeaseRenewalIT tests are failing Key: PHOENIX-2979 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2979 Project: Phoenix Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2898) HTable not closed in ConnectionQueryServicesImpl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323175#comment-15323175 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2898: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1247 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2924) Remove staging repository once Apache Tephra 0.8.0 is released

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323176#comment-15323176 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2924: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1247 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2899) Add test for inflight transactions over partially evaluating filters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323177#comment-15323177 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2899: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1247 (See

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2942) Order by incorrect for RVC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323178#comment-15323178 ] Hudson commented on PHOENIX-2942: - FAILURE: Integrated in Phoenix-master #1247 (See

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2978) For multi-tenant tables, associated index namespace should be created automatically

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mujtaba Chohan resolved PHOENIX-2978. - Resolution: Duplicate Thanks [~an...@apache.org]. Resolving this as _related to_

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2977) TNF exception for SYSTEM.STATS and SYSTEM.SEQUENCE table after enabling namespace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mujtaba Chohan resolved PHOENIX-2977. - Resolution: Duplicate Thanks [~an...@apache.org]. Resolving this as dupe. > TNF

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2977) TNF exception for SYSTEM.STATS and SYSTEM.SEQUENCE table after enabling namespace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323138#comment-15323138 ] Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-2977: Sorry [~mujtabachohan] for trouble. But I already fixed

[jira] [Comment Edited] (PHOENIX-2978) For multi-tenant tables, associated index namespace should be created automatically

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323119#comment-15323119 ] Ankit Singhal edited comment on PHOENIX-2978 at 6/9/16 6:59 PM: Thanks

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2901) If namespaces are enabled, check for existence of schema when sequence created

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323120#comment-15323120 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-2901: --- Thanks [~an...@apache.org]. Patch looks good to me then!

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2978) For multi-tenant tables, associated index namespace should be created automatically

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323119#comment-15323119 ] Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-2978: Thanks [~mujtabachohan] for testing namespace feature,

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2978) For multi-tenant tables, associated index namespace should be created automatically

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mujtaba Chohan updated PHOENIX-2978: Assignee: Ankit Singhal > For multi-tenant tables, associated index namespace should be

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2901) If namespaces are enabled, check for existence of schema when sequence created

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323068#comment-15323068 ] Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-2901: bq. I am not convinced this is the right thing to do

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2977) TNF exception for SYSTEM.STATS and SYSTEM.SEQUENCE table after enabling namespace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mujtaba Chohan updated PHOENIX-2977: Description: Environment: 4.x-HBase-0.98

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2899) Add test for inflight transactions over partially evaluating filters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-2899. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: James Taylor > Add test for inflight transactions over

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2924) Remove staging repository once Apache Tephra 0.8.0 is released

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-2924. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: James Taylor > Remove staging repository once Apache

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2942) Order by incorrect for RVC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor resolved PHOENIX-2942. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: James Taylor > Order by incorrect for RVC >

[jira] [Created] (PHOENIX-2977) TNF exception for SYSTEM.STATS and SYSTEM.SEQUENCE table after enabling namespace

Mujtaba Chohan created PHOENIX-2977: --- Summary: TNF exception for SYSTEM.STATS and SYSTEM.SEQUENCE table after enabling namespace Key: PHOENIX-2977 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2977

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2977) TNF exception for SYSTEM.STATS and SYSTEM.SEQUENCE table after enabling namespace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mujtaba Chohan updated PHOENIX-2977: Assignee: Ankit Singhal > TNF exception for SYSTEM.STATS and SYSTEM.SEQUENCE table after

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2901) If namespaces are enabled, check for existence of schema when sequence created

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15323028#comment-15323028 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-2901: --- [~an...@apache.org] - thanks for the patch. I am not

[jira] [Resolved] (PHOENIX-2814) WhereOptimizer does not handle multi-tenant local index correctly when connection is non-tenant-specific

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Samarth Jain resolved PHOENIX-2814. --- Resolution: Fixed > WhereOptimizer does not handle multi-tenant local index correctly when

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2814) WhereOptimizer does not handle multi-tenant local index correctly when connection is non-tenant-specific

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322940#comment-15322940 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-2814: --- Agreed. This should be fixed once PHOENIX-2276 is fixed.

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2942) Order by incorrect for RVC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322935#comment-15322935 ] Samarth Jain commented on PHOENIX-2942: --- +1, looks good. > Order by incorrect for RVC >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2903) Handle split during scan for row key ordered aggregations

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2903: -- Attachment: PHOENIX-2903_v5_wip.patch Parking WIP patch. I think I've come up with a simpler

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2814) WhereOptimizer does not handle multi-tenant local index correctly when connection is non-tenant-specific

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322640#comment-15322640 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2814: --- [~samarthjain] - looks like this will be fixed with

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2814) WhereOptimizer does not handle multi-tenant local index correctly when connection is non-tenant-specific

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated PHOENIX-2814: --- Assignee: rajeshbabu (was: Samarth Jain) > WhereOptimizer does not handle multi-tenant

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2814) WhereOptimizer does not handle multi-tenant local index correctly when connection is non-tenant-specific

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322266#comment-15322266 ] Ankit Singhal commented on PHOENIX-2814: Assigning to [~rajesh23] after discussing with

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2892) Scan for pre-warming the block cache for 2ndary index should be removed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2892?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15322160#comment-15322160 ] Enis Soztutar commented on PHOENIX-2892: Did the test again with 3M inserts with YCSB, this time

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2942) Order by incorrect for RVC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2942: -- Attachment: PHOENIX-2942_v2.patch > Order by incorrect for RVC > -- >

[jira] [Updated] (PHOENIX-2942) Order by incorrect for RVC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Taylor updated PHOENIX-2942: -- Attachment: (was: PHOENIX-2942.patch) > Order by incorrect for RVC >

[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2965) Use DistinctPrefixFilter logic for COUNT(DISTINCT ...) and COUNT(...) GROUP BY

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15321969#comment-15321969 ] James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2965: --- +1. Great work, [~lhofhansl]! > Use DistinctPrefixFilter